[Grammar] Mr. Ram didn't agree

Status
Not open for further replies.

suniljain

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Mr. Ram didn't agree with it and he left adjourning the meeting.

I want to understand why can't we use adjourned above and why to use present participle?

Thanks
 

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Because the present participle is needed to modify 'he'.

Not a teacher.
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Additionally, a comma after 'left' is essential.
 

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Matthew, this is a different construction. In this case, "adjourning" could have been preceded by "thus" or "thereby".
 

suniljain

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Can you please explain what do you mean by modify? If I use adjourned, it wouldn't modify "he".

I just what to understand clearly whether in place of present participle, we can use past participle or not
 

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/modify See definition#2.
I think you can say 'he left and adjourned the meeting', where 'adjourned' is the simple past instead of the past participle, and it is a verb instead of a modifier.

Not a teacher.
 

suniljain

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Hindi
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
If I don't want to use and then it should be adjourning only. May I say after one past participle we can't use another present participle immediately thereafter.
 

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
Examples please.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
I just what to understand clearly whether in place of present participle, we can use past participle or not
If you end up with a grammatical sentence that means what you intend, you can use either (in this case).
"Mr. Ram didn't agree with it and he left, adjourning the meeting." (This could mean that his leaving automatically adjourned the meeting, or that, on leaving, he adjourned the meeting.)
"Mr. Ram didn't agree with it and he adjourned the meeting and left." (Note that the word order needed changing, since he could not have adjourned the meeting after he'd left.)
"Mr. Ram didn't agree with it and he adjourned the meeting by leaving." This is another possibility, if his leaving automatically adjourns the meeting.

NO rules are meant to be taken from this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top