Results 1 to 2 of 2
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Japanese
      • Home Country:
      • Japan
      • Current Location:
      • Japan

    • Join Date: Jan 2008
    • Posts: 559
    #1

    It has been only a few hundred years that we've known that we are mammals

    Dear all,

    1. It has been only a few hundred years that we've known that we are mammals.

    2. It is only a few hundred years that we've known that we are mammals.

    Are the sentences above both fine?

    Thank you!

    OP

  1. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 41,868
    #2

    Re: It has been only a few hundred years that we've known that we are mammals

    Yes.
    Remember - if you don't use correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing, anything you write will be incorrect.

Similar Threads

  1. [Grammar] He lived to be hundred years/ a hundred years old
    By wotcha in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31-Mar-2012, 04:28
  2. [Grammar] The dark patina cross was over three hundred and seventy years old
    By Ferdie11 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-Apr-2011, 08:00
  3. thirteen hundred years?
    By Mhd shaher in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-Feb-2010, 10:50
  4. Two hundred years ago it used to...
    By Daruma in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-May-2009, 17:29
  5. mammals -vs- reptiles
    By devans in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 19-Oct-2004, 11:49

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •