[Grammar] Nothing to wear or....

Status
Not open for further replies.

xoleoni97

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Indonesian
Home Country
Indonesia
Current Location
Indonesia
Lately, I've found something confusing. Such as "nothing to wear", "nothing to lose", "nothing to laugh". Aren't those sentence supposed to be passive voice? Like "nothing to be worn" etc



thanks
 

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
The (pro)noun modified by a to-infinitive can be the patient of it, as in 'the first thing to do', so it is correct not to use the passive voice.

Not a teacher.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
***** NOT A TEACHER *****


I found some information that may interest you.

1. "There was a lot to do." / "There was a lot to be done."

a. One expert says that the "active and passive infinitives are sometimes [ my emphasis] interchangeable."

2. He points out, too, that they can have different meanings.

a. "There was nothing to do so we played computer games." ( = we were bored.)

b. "There was nothing to be done." ( = We can't change that.")


Credit: L.G. Alexander, Longman English Grammar (1998 edition, page 312).
 

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
I think the passive infinitive must be used if it is followed by 'by someone/something', but I am not a teacher.
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Lately, I've found something confusing. Such as "nothing to wear", "nothing to lose", "nothing to laugh". Aren't those sentence supposed to be passive voice? Like "nothing to be worn" etc



thanks

There is nothing wrong with your examples (except the third needs at least one more word, such as "at").
 
Last edited:

Polyester

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
***** NOT A TEACHER *****


I found some information that may interest you.

1. "There was a lot to do." / "There was a lot to be done."

a. One expert says that the "active and passive infinitives are sometimes [ my emphasis] interchangeable."

2. He points out, too, that they can have different meanings.

a. "There was nothing to do so we played computer games." ( = we were bored.)

b. "There was nothing to be done." ( = We can't change that.")


Credit: L.G. Alexander, Longman English Grammar (1998 edition, page 312).

What did the sentence mean in no.1?
 

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
'There were a lot of things to do/to be done.'

Not a teacher.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top