Preposition, adverb, and adjective

[MikeNewYork]

I disagree with Ms. Weaver. "Up ahead" is acting as an adjective; the phrase defines "hills".

We classify words and phrases as different parts of speech based on what they do in a sentence. If it walks like an adjective....

 

[mawes12]

I disagree with Ms. Weaver. "Up ahead" is acting as an adjective; the phrase defines "hills".

We classify words and phrases as different parts of speech based on what they do in a sentence. If it walks like an adjective....

I think both are correct because when you use a relative clause, it acts like an adverb but when the preposition is after the noun, it acts like an adjective so it might be saying "the hills up ahead the road/"any place" with the road/"any place" acting as a secret noun. Do y'all agree?

 

[bebe heart]

He is a tall man.

Here tall is adjective?

John is very tall.

Very is adjective or tall?

 

[mawes12]

He is a tall man.

Here tall is adjective?

John is very tall.

Very is adjective or tall?

tall is adjective.

very is adverb.

"is" is a linking verb.

 

[MikeNewYork]

If there actually were a relative clause one could classify "up ahead" as adverbial, but there is no relative clause in the sentence. If we are going to add things to the sentence, let's throw in an elephant, a jet, and a Ferrari. :roll:

 

[mawes12]

If there actually were a relative clause one could classify "up ahead" as adverbial, but there is no relative clause in the sentence. If we are going to add things to the sentence, let's throw in an elephant, a jet, and a Ferrari. :roll:

That kinda made me laugh but in parser's comment, he adds the relative conjunction "which".

 

[bebe heart]

John was running very fast.
Here (very) is adverb Or (fast) ?

 

[mawes12]

John was running very fast.
Here (very) is adverb Or (fast) ?

Both are adverb. Most adjective can become an adverb by adding the suffix -ly or without adding -ly.

 

[Matthew Wai]

I think 'very' is an adverb modifying another adverb 'fast', which modifies 'running', but I am not a teacher.

 

[MikeNewYork]

I was taught to parse the sentence that was there, not the one I wish was there.

 

[mawes12]

I was taught to parse the sentence that was there, not the one I wish was there.

I don't understand. Can you explain?

 

[Matthew Wai]

I think MikeNewYork was referring to bebe heart's sentences, which were originally not there but s/he wished to be there.

Not a teacher.

 

[mawes12]

I think MikeNewYork was referring to bebe heart's sentences, which were originally not there but s/he wished to be there.

Not a teacher.

Which sentences?

 

[Matthew Wai]

Those in post#43 and #47.

"the hills up ahead the road/"any place"

I would add 'of' after 'ahead', but I am not a teacher.

If we are going to add things to the sentence...

I think both grammarians and TheParser like to do so when analyzing sentences.

 

[mawes12]

Those in post#43 and #47.

Not a teacher.

maybe he was talking about me but let's wait until he's online again.

 

[mawes12]

I would add 'of' after 'ahead', but I am not a teacher.

Sounds about right and I think you can also add "on" after "ahead". I might be wrong.

 

[MikeNewYork]

I was talking about rewriting a sentence and then parsing it as if it were the original sentence.

 

[Matthew Wai]

I think it was not so much rewriting as adding something in order to explain it, but I am not a teacher.

 

[mawes12]

I was talking about rewriting a sentence and then parsing it as if it were the original sentence.

So were you talking about what I added after the preposition?

 

[TheParser]

I think it was not so much rewriting as adding something in order to explain it..

***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Exactly!

When a conscientious student asks, "Teacher, why does one say 'You are taller than I?," many teachers might explain: "The complete sentence is 'You are taller than I am.' "

Such an explanation would help the student to understand the use of "I."

(Of course, in 2015, most native speakers -- including very well educated ones -- feel that it is more natural to say "...than me." But that's another matter.)

Many teachers feel that teaching ellipsis (some words are missing) is really appreciated by conscientious students who want teachers to explain the "why" of many sentences.

Quirk and his three fellow scholars explain, for example, in "The road back is dense with traffic," that is probably an ellipsis for something such as "The road that leads back to London is dense with traffic."