Results 1 to 2 of 2
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Chinese
      • Home Country:
      • Taiwan
      • Current Location:
      • Taiwan

    • Join Date: Dec 2006
    • Posts: 1,892

    Non-defining relative clause, comma
    The genesis of, and inspiration for, Wheelock’s Latin was the 1946 G.I. Education bill which granted World War II Veterans a college education upon their return from service.
    I think there should be a comma before "which" because the clause in red is a non-defining relative clause. Am I right?
    Last edited by sitifan; 18-Jul-2015 at 09:25.
    I need native speakers' help.

  1. bhaisahab's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Ireland

    • Join Date: Apr 2008
    • Posts: 25,592

    Re: Non-defining relative clause, comma

    Yes, there should be a comma.

Similar Threads

  1. [Grammar] Defining or non-defining relative clause
    By tigertiger in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-May-2015, 09:04
  2. defining, non-defining relative clause - whom, commas
    By barnej0096 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31-Aug-2013, 20:23
  3. [Grammar] Defining Relative Clause
    By bedestam in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-Dec-2008, 13:32
  4. Relative clause(non-defining/defining)
    By tzfujimino in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-Jun-2008, 18:43
  5. different between defining and non defining relative clause
    By in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-Feb-2008, 12:53


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts