Parsing.

Status
Not open for further replies.

tkacka15

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Is my parsing correct?

"He persuaded her not to go."

He - the subject;

persuaded - the predicator (the verb);

her - the indirect object;

not to go - the direct object (a non-finite infinitive clause).

Thank you.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
No, 'her' is the direct object.
 

lotus888

Member
Joined
May 6, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Is my parsing correct?

"He persuaded her not to go."

He - the subject;

persuaded - the predicator (the verb);

her - the indirect object;

not to go - the direct object (a non-finite infinitive clause).

Thank you.

The reason why you think "her" is an indirect object is because "persuade" is actually acting as a causative verb.

He persuaded her (not) to go. For now, let's exclude "not".

He persuaded her to go. The "persuasion" is what caused her to go.

CAUSE + PERSON + TO + VERB
PERSUADE + PERSON + TO + VERB

In this case, the person is the agent for the action.

He made her puke. He didn't puke. She's the one who puked. He caused her to puke.

She is not the object of made. She is simply an agent of the verb puke (it happened to her).

The way I see it, the PERSON is neither a direct nor indirect object -- she is simply an agent.

http://www.espressoenglish.net/causative-verbs-in-english-let-make-have-get-help/

http://www.myenglishpages.com/site_php_files/grammar-lesson-causative-verb.php



--lotus
 

tkacka15

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
No, 'her' is the direct object.

Thank you, Raymott, for your reply.

I understand it this way:

He persuaded [what] not to go into [whom] her.

Is my understanding of it right?
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
***** NOT A TEACHER *****


Hello, Tkacka:

I have good news and bad news for you.

The bad news is that there appear to be several "correct" ways to interpret your sentence -- depending on which book you are using.

The good news is that one huge book respected by scholars throughout the world * agrees with you that "her" is an indirect object. Let me cite a few of its points:

1. "I told/advised/persuaded Mark to see a doctor."

a. The book says that "the noun phrase [Mark] is an indirect object, ... the indirect object refers to the addressee ["Mark"]."

b. The book then gives this passive sentence [as "proof"?]: Mark was told/advised/ persuaded to see a doctor."

c. The book reminds us that we cannot say "To see a doctor was told [/persuaded] Mark."


As I said, the analysis depends on the book that you use.

I, of course, shall keep my opinion to myself, and I shall never gainsay anything that a teacher tells you. I just thought, however, that it would OK to let you know that there are several ways to parse your sentence.


*Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech, Svartvik, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (1985 edition), page 1215.

P.S. To make the situation more fun, look at this sentence from a reputable book:

"The dean requested me to report at once [to his office?]." (My emphasis)

a. The two scholars claim that "me to report at once" is the direct object of the verb (and "me" is the subject of the infinitive).

b. I guess that the "huge" book would disagree, for it says that "request" is to be analyzed in the same way that "persuade" is.

Pence and Emery, A Grammar of Present-Day English (1947 and 1963), page 70.
 
Last edited:

Matthew Wai

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2013
Member Type
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
not to go - the direct object (a non-finite infinitive clause).
I think 'not to go' is a to-infinitive acting as an adjective modifying 'her', but I am not a teacher.
 

tkacka15

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Thank you, The Parser, for your detailed and interesting replay.


"I just thought, however, that it would OK to let you know that there are several ways to parse your sentence."

Yes, I couldn't agree more.
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I agree with Parser. These seemingly simple constructions are difficult to analyze. One of of the most perplexing sentences comes from a children's book. "See Spot run". The best analysis that I have seen has "Spot" as the indirect object.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
1. "I told/advised/persuaded Mark to see a doctor."

a. The book says that "the noun phrase [Mark] is an indirect object, ... the indirect object refers to the addressee ["Mark"]."

b. The book then gives this passive sentence [as "proof"?]: Mark was told/advised/ persuaded to see a doctor."


*Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech, Svartvik, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (1985 edition), page 1215.

"The dean requested me to report at once [to his office?]." (My emphasis)
1. I agree that the second may be right. But 'requested' is not 'persuaded'. You can request a coffee, but you can't persuade a coffee. This is important to my argument below.

2. 1b doesn't 'prove' the claim.
"I hit the dog."; "The dog was hit". This 'proves' that the dog is the direct object.
"I persuaded Mark."; "Mark was persuaded". So, how does this 'prove' that Mark is the indirect object?
"I gave Mark a book."; "Mark was given a book"; "A book was given to Mark." Does the first passive variant 'prove' that 'Mark' is the direct object, while the second 'proves' that 'the book' is the direct object?
There's something fishy about this proof.
Actually, Quirk doesn't present this as a proof, just an illustration. There are obviously different ways of parsing this.

Taking the original, "He persuaded her not to go", and asserting that this essentially means "He persuaded 'not to go' to her" then, yes, 'her' is indirect. It would be more convincing with "suggested/advised". That would make "not to go" a suggestion or a piece of advice. But is it a persuasion? 'She' is the patient (in the agent/patient schema). 'He' affected a change in 'her'. Persuasion is not a simple telling or suggesting or advising.
So, I'm sticking with 'her' as the direct object in this case, and I reserve the right not to parse the rest of the sentence.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
***** NOT A TEACHER *****

For those members and guests who may be interested in this topic, I have found something else to share.

First, let's NOT discuss the difference between "to convince" and "to persuade." For some speakers, there is a difference that should be observed. For the sake of this post, however, let's not go there.

*****

One scholar gives this example: "Amdromeda persuaded/convinced Perseus to leave at once."

The scholar says that those two verbs "mean something like 'cause someone to intend to take some action.' "


Source: Roderick A. Jacobs, University of Hawai'i [sic] at Manoa, English Syntax / A Grammar for English Language Professionals (1995), Oxford University Press, page 297.
 

lotus888

Member
Joined
May 6, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I agree.


Andromeda?


--lotus
 

tkacka15

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Does 'not to go' function as a noun, an adjective or an adverb?

No, in my parsing it functions as a direct object, in Raymott's parsing "not to go" follows the direct object "her" and in my tentative understanding he means it as an adjunct.

Anyway, I think that your question is the one about the word classes rather than about the functions of the "not to go" in that sentence. I classify it as a non-finite clause where "her" is an implied subject, "not" an adverb and "to go" a verb.
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
First, let's NOT discuss the difference between "to convince" and "to persuade."
There's no need to. They have the same function in making the person who is persuaded or convinced the direct object.
 

mawes12

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
In "I told her not to go.", I think "not to go" is acting like a noun there because I think it answers the question, "What has he told her?".

I might be wrong though.
 
Last edited:

tzfujimino

Key Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Japanese
Home Country
Japan
Current Location
Japan
He persuaded her not to go.

He - subject
persuaded - verb
her - object
not to go - object complement

This is how I would parse the sentence.
(I'm not a grammarian.)
 

tkacka15

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top