Osbri
Junior Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2015
- Member Type
- Other
- Native Language
- English
- Home Country
- United States
- Current Location
- United States
In this thread https://www.usingenglish.com/forum/threads/234663-That-clause-is-an-adverb-clause-or-a-complement, I was trying to explain why I thought the that-clause was a noun-clause but I think Mike misinterpret what I said and thought I said that an indirect object can be a prepositional object but I was saying that to know if the that-clause is a noun clause or not, you can put the indirect object after the preposition, 'to' or 'for', and put the direct object before those prepositions and after a main verb or double object verb and it will still have the same meaning. Did I say something wrong? And please don't lock the thread before we all agree.