tyrp
Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Russian
- Home Country
- Ukraine
- Current Location
- Ukraine
Hello everyone,
I've got quite puzzled recently with the subject-verb agreement. Does a forward slash (/)used between two synonymous subjects ask for a singular or plural verb-predicate?
E.g. Shall/will IS (or ARE ???) attached to the infinitive of the notional verb to form future tenses.
The problem is that if I understand '/' as synonymous with OR, the verb will be in the singular: Shall, or will, is attached...
If, on the contrary, '/' means AND, the verb will be plural: Shall and will are attached....
Actually, the change in the meaning of the whole sentence brought about by the use of OR or AND is very slight and unimportant in the context given. It holds good in either case.
So which is the traditional way of treating '/', and, thus, the form of the verb after it?
Thanks a million in advance!!!
I've got quite puzzled recently with the subject-verb agreement. Does a forward slash (/)used between two synonymous subjects ask for a singular or plural verb-predicate?
E.g. Shall/will IS (or ARE ???) attached to the infinitive of the notional verb to form future tenses.
The problem is that if I understand '/' as synonymous with OR, the verb will be in the singular: Shall, or will, is attached...
If, on the contrary, '/' means AND, the verb will be plural: Shall and will are attached....
Actually, the change in the meaning of the whole sentence brought about by the use of OR or AND is very slight and unimportant in the context given. It holds good in either case.
So which is the traditional way of treating '/', and, thus, the form of the verb after it?
Thanks a million in advance!!!