The issue of volunteering as a compulsory part of
thesecondary education has been addressed for a long time. Even though while some people believe theschools should require the students to work in the community, others believe this should be kept as an optional experience for the adolescents. This essay outlines the arguments behind both perspectives and suggests a proper approach.
Several people are
convicted ofconvinced about the benefits that acompulsory unpaid community service by the students can bring to the society. The main assumption under this point of view is the contact that teenagers can have with their communities, understanding the problems and collaborating to overcome local challenges. Martha Ryed, leader of a local NGO, confirms the mindset change of those students engaged with her organization: ``They develop a wider overview from the real world, obtaining maturity within some weeks of work. Every secondary student should experience this”.
However, skeptics affirm that turning a self-motivated volunteering programme into a massive, compulsory educational course will undermine its real meaning. They believe, one should highlight the benefits and prod students to fulfill such jobs. Activities as group-sharing or online
publishmentpublishing of prior experiences can foster the free participation of more adolescents.
I strongly believe the efforts of doing a community service should
blossomcome from the own students and not through rules and regulations. The comprehension of local difficulties can definitely enhance the political and social perspectives fromof the pupils, but one must also consider the drawbacks of forcing them to work unpaid.
Student or Learner