Results 1 to 2 of 2
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Turkish
      • Home Country:
      • Turkey
      • Current Location:
      • Turkey

    • Join Date: Sep 2014
    • Posts: 576
    • Post Thanks / Like

    The meaning of Should in the immediate future


    "Had better" refers to the immediate future. It is more urgent than "should" or "ought to." Compare:

    I really ought to go and see Fred one of these days. ~ Well, you'd better do it soon -- he's leaving for South Africa at the end of the month."

    The source: Practical English Usage (p. 203)

    I'd like to ask what if I use 'should")' instead of 'had better'. I mean, how it changes the meaning?


  1. emsr2d2's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • UK

    • Join Date: Jul 2009
    • Posts: 33,511
    • Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The meaning of Should in the immediate future

    Yes, you can use "should" there and I can see no difference in meaning.
    Remember - if you don't use correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing, anything you write will be incorrect.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19-Sep-2013, 13:01
  2. present for the future meaning
    By edmondjanet in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 21-Sep-2011, 21:00
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-Jan-2011, 18:35
  4. [Grammar] Will Future/Future continuous/Future perfect
    By Metathron in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27-Jul-2008, 01:27
  5. the present progressive with future meaning
    By soleiljy in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 24-Nov-2007, 18:34


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts