# Thread: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

1. ## The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

Hi,

The position of the light projector is in the front of the object. If the angle is equal to 0 or 180 degrees, then no shadow will be produced as the light direction is parallel to the x-axis.
It seems there are too many "the"s in the first sentence, but I think it is correct. Is the first highlighted "the" can be omitted to make the sentence as clear and concise as possible?

For the second highlighted "degrees", is the plural correct in here?

I used "degrees" because the preceding number is 180, but it doesn't match with the 0 because the 0 should say "0 degree". Does it need to change to "If the angle is equal to 0 degree or 180 degrees"?

Thanks.

2. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

Originally Posted by fenglish
the 0 should say "0 degree".
Zero is plural, so it should be '0 degrees'.

3. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

Originally Posted by Matthew Wai
Zero is plural, so it should be '0 degrees'.
Thanks, but I found an interesting link, it says zero may be plural and may be not.

http://english.stackexchange.com/que...is-zero-plural

"No" is usually plural as well: "I have no books." Sometimes it's not: "No moon was in the sky" (unless you live on Mars or Jupiter). I would guess the reason that "zero" is plural is that it inherited the most common plurality of "no". In fact, zero is not always plural. You say "zero tolerance" and not "zero tolerances".

4. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

I think 'zero' in 'zero tolerance' means 'none at all' rather than the number 0.

5. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

Originally Posted by fenglish
Is the first highlighted "the" can be omitted to make the sentence as clear and concise as possible?
I think the meaning would be different if it was omitted, because 'the front' means 'the front part'.

6. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

Originally Posted by Matthew Wai
I think the meaning would be different if it was omitted, because 'the front' means 'the front part'.
po

The position of the light projector is in the front of the object.

How can the position of the projector be in "the front part of the object"? The projector is just in front of the object.

7. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

I don't think we can tell where the light projector is unless we know what the object is. I can't see a problem with a light projector being in the front of an object though. We need more information.

8. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

Originally Posted by tedmc
How can the position of the projector be in "the front part of the object"?
A projector is an object. What is the problem with putting an object in the front part of another object?

9. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

Object A is in the front part of object B.

This sounds like Object A is riding on object B to me.

10. ## Re: The position of the light projector is in the front of the object

"The lens is in the front part of the camera."
"The engine is in the front part of the car."
"The pencils are in the front part of the drawer."

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•