Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. aachu's Avatar
    Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Urdu
      • Home Country:
      • Pakistan
      • Current Location:
      • Afghanistan

    • Join Date: Jun 2011
    • Posts: 191
    #1

    were+ should have been

    In talking about a situation where including a player 'x' in the team was discussed 10 years back, one of the coaches justifies his decision of not including' x' in the team then by saying (10 years later):
    "At that time I thought that if 'x' were to be included in the team then ' y' and 'z' should have also been included because they had performed better than 'x'."

    Shouldn't it have been ' if 'x' were to be included... then 'y' and 'z' would also be included--the "If+ past + would" structure?

  2. VIP Member
    Interested in Language
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Dec 2015
    • Posts: 12,094
    #2

    Re: were+ should have been

    No. Using would would imply causality, as if including y and z became necessary once x was chosen.
    I am not a teacher.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •