Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. VIP Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Hindi
      • Home Country:
      • India
      • Current Location:
      • India

    • Join Date: Feb 2014
    • Posts: 5,434
    #1

    There was no mistaking that jaunty walk.

    There was no mistaking that jaunty walk.

    I couldn't understand this part "no mistaking that". Could you please help. I think the usage is weird for me.

    Can we say "there was no mistaking that he was a thief"?

  2. Raymott's Avatar
    VIP Member
    Academic
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 25,447
    #2

    Re: There was no mistaking that jaunty walk.

    There was no mistaking [that jaunty walk.]
    "No mistaking" doesn't belong with "that jaunty walk". 'That' is not a relative pronoun; it's a determiner.
    A: "What jaunty walk?"
    B: "That jaunty walk!"

    It appears to mean that there is no mistaking who that jaunty walk belongs to. "There's no mistaking that jaunty walk. That is Jaunty Jake."

    Yes, you can use that thief sentence.
    Last edited by Raymott; 24-May-2017 at 07:31. Reason: typo

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •