2:45 at night

Status
Not open for further replies.

johnnyB7

New member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
German
Home Country
Switzerland
Current Location
Switzerland
Hello Community
I am working on song lyric. The line in question is this:
"It's 2:45 at night"
Now, I learned that you would actually say it's 2:45 in the morning and not at night, right?
The problem is, that i need a one-syllable word at the end of this sentence, so "morning" kind of doesn't work.

My question is, is "at night" plain wrong or is it just unusual?
Do you maybe habe an Idea for another solution?
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Welcome to the forum, Johnny.:)

In song lyrics, anything goes. Go right ahead and use it; it's not all that unusual.

Would 2:45am fit?
 

johnnyB7

New member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
German
Home Country
Switzerland
Current Location
Switzerland
Great, thank you!
2:45 a.m. might work, but "at night" sounds kind of nicer i think.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Hello. [STRIKE]Community[/STRIKE]

I am working on a song lyric. The line in question is this:

"It's 2:45 at night"

[STRIKE]Now,[/STRIKE] I have learned that you would actually say it's 2:45 in the morning and not at night. Is that right?
The problem is (no comma here) that I need a one-syllable word at the end of this sentence, so "morning" [STRIKE]kind of[/STRIKE] doesn't work.

My question is, is "at night" plain wrong or is it just unusual?
Do you maybe [STRIKE]habe[/STRIKE] have an idea for another solution?

Great. Thank you!
"2:45 a.m." might work, but "at night" sounds [STRIKE]kind of[/STRIKE] nicer, I think.

Please note my corrections above. It's important to capitalise the word "I" (first person singular pronoun) every time you write it.

The only idea I had was "2.45 am" too, because (in total) the line will have the same number of syllables as the original. I don't like "2.45 at night". However, song lyrics frequently don't follow the rules of grammar - the rhyme and rhythm of the song are more important. On that basis, you can say anything you want.
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
You asked whether night is just plain wrong. It's wrong, because 2:45 isn't night. It's 2:45 in the afternoon.

In poem, you have to be careful about the number of syllables in each line.

But in a song, you don't. They adjust themselves to fit the music. A syllable can be a whole note, two whole notes, a half note, a quarter note, a sixteenth, whatever.

For artistic purposes, you can also consider saying "quarter of three." It's conversational.
 

GoesStation

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Great, thank you!
2:45 a.m. might work, but "at night" sounds kind of nicer i think.

If it sounds nicer, it's probably the better choice for a song. Songwriters happily do this sort of thing- words have to fit the tune, and cutting corners with grammar is a common way of doing it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top