[Grammar] Trust and hope

Status
Not open for further replies.

aristotle2155

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Telugu
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
Is the following statement grammatically correct:

"Trust you all are safe and practicing good...."

Should it not rather be "We trust that you all are safe and...." or "We hope that you all are safe and..."

Thanks
A
 

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Please complete the unfinished sentence, and tell us who wrote it.
 
Last edited:

aristotle2155

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Telugu
Home Country
India
Current Location
India
It came in as email from the secretary of a gym club (in the context of covid-19). His full statement was:

Trust you all are safe and practicing good hygiene by regularly washing your hands adequately with soap and / or hand sanitiser.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
It would be understood by anyone who read it but it's grammatically incomplete. It needs to start with either "I" or "We". At the moment, it looks like an imperative.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
It's common to omit first person subject pronouns at the beginning of sentences in conversational written texts like this.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Absolutely! I should have said it's common to do this, but as an example of a grammatical sentence, it's incorrect.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I prefer hope to trust here.


(Being British, I would write practising.)
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Good question.

We often drop the I when it's the first word of a sentence. The way we look at it, it's understood.

Think of "Thank you." It really means "I thank you." We do the same thing in other statements.

- Didn't know you felt that way.
- Hope you can make it here.
- Wonder why she said that.
- Bet you didn't expect that.
- Should've known better.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
It came in as email from the secretary of a gym club (in the context of covid-19). His full statement was:

Trust you all are safe and practicing good hygiene by regularly washing your hands adequately with soap and / or hand sanitiser.

I think I better use the hand sanitizer, since apparently I didn't bother with the hot water.
:roll:
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
. . . His full statement was:

Trust you all are safe and practicing good hygiene by regularly washing your hands adequately with soap and / or hand sanitiser.
The only thing I'd change is the and/or. Those are speed bumps that make writers feel thorough but sound verbose.

He could have just said or. That wouldn't stop anyone from using both.

Correction: I don't think I would have said adequately, either. Who would intentionally wash inadequately? Come on.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
The only thing I'd change is the and/or.

That's for when the person can't make up their mind.
:)
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Some people do need it spelled out for them.

... practising good hygiene by washing your hands regularly for 20 seconds with soap and hot water, and using hand sanitiser.
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Not doing them for long enough?
For sure!

But in writing instructions, adequately seems - uh - inadequate. And wordy. We all think we're washing adequately when we wash. But are we? All of us?

So rather than using an ambiguous modifier, it would be better to add more specifics, like with hot water or for at least thirty seconds or preferably employing an autoclave.

Now excuse me while I go pick some more nits. (And then employ, adequately, an autoclave . . .)
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
The only thing I'd change is the and/or. Those are speed bumps that make writers feel thorough but sound verbose.

He could have just said or. That wouldn't stop anyone from using both.

I must say I disagree with all of that, Charlie.

The writer chose to use and/or for a reason. Using only or does not deliver the same message.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top