[Grammar] You can do worse than ...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
Hi,

In "You can do worse than become a lawyer" (a more common alternative is "You could do worse than"), what does the "can" mean?
Some people say it is used to indicate possibility, but there are different types of possibility. What kind of possibility does the "can" indicate?

I'd appreciate your help.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I'm not sure I've ever seen it used with anything other than "could", but I would say that the "You can" version means "It is possible to" as a general statement, rather than being directed specifically at the listener. It could be worded "One can do worse than ...".
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
I'm not sure I've ever seen it used with anything other than "could", but I would say that the "You can" version means "It is possible to" as a general statement, rather than being directed specifically at the listener. It could be worded "One can do worse than ...".

Is it correct to say "You can catch a cold if you go out without wearing a coat"?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Is it correct to say "You can catch a cold if you go out without wearing a coat"?

Yes, but again that's just a statement of general possibility. "Anyone can catch a cold if they go out without a coat." If you're aiming that comment at someone who is about to leave the house, coatless, say "You might/could catch a cold if you go out without a coat".
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
Yes, but again that's just a statement of general possibility. "Anyone can catch a cold if they go out without a coat." If you're aiming that comment at someone who is about to leave the house, coatless, say "You might/could catch a cold if you go out without a coat".

In affirmative sentences, "can"seems to indicate a tendency, not tied to a one-time occasion. "He can be at home now" seems an incorrect version of "He could/may/might be at home now," whereas "It can get really cold in the winter there" seems fine. Is the "can" in "You can do worse than ask John for help" an unusual word choice for this reason?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
It's possible.

I really suspect the "can" in "can do worse than" is a quirk of English.
"He can do worse than marry Mary" is not a statement of general applicability. It's about a particular situation.

But maybe the sentence is ill-formed. We need speakers who accept "can" in such sentences in principle to verify its acceptability.
 
Last edited:

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I would find that very unnatural. I would still expect "He could do worse than marry Mary".
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
I would find that very unnatural. I would still expect "He could do worse than marry Mary".

We'd need to find someone who accepts the "can" in "You can do worse than become a lawyer," and then have him/her decide whether "he can do worse than marry Sarah" is acceptable. Since you don't like "You can do worse than become a lawyer," it is not suprising that you find "he can do worse than ..." unnatural.

We want to test whether the general vs. specific difference determies the use of "can" in "can do worse than V."
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
We want to test whether the general vs. specific difference determies the use of "can" in "can do worse than V."

Who wants to test that?

I can already tell you that it does.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
Who wants to test that?

I can already tell you that it does.


If the use of "can" in "can do worse than V" really calls for general possibility, we'd expect "Henry can do worse than marry Sarah" to be unacceptable. If the sentence is acceptable, then this use of "can" does not hinge on general possibility. That's why it is necessary to find a speaker who accepts (and uses) "can do worse than V" in principle, to test the hypothesis.

Edit: I seem to have found an instance where "can do worse than V" does not hinge on general possibility:

They'll have to work hard not to vanish amid the morass of similar bands, though, and for that they can do worse than look at the main act.

https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/1068804.youre-beautiful/


 
Last edited:

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
If the use of "can" in "can do worse than V" really calls for general possibility, we'd expect "Henry can do worse than marry Sarah" to be unacceptable.

Not necessarily. How would you know that the speaker of that sentence was not using can in the general possibility sense? My view is that the use of can there is evidence that the speaker is thinking in terms of general possibility.

Edit: I seem to have found an instance where "can do worse than V" does not hinge on general possibility:

They'll have to work hard not to vanish amid the morass of similar bands, though, and for that they can do worse than look at the main act.

I agree that that is an unusual word choice (one would expect could) but I don't think it reveals much.
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Good comments above. Could (and can) it be a matter of context?:

- You're marrying him? Come on. You can do better than that!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
Not necessarily. How would you know that the speaker of that sentence was not using can in the general possibility sense? My view is that the use of can there is evidence that the speaker is thinking in terms of general possibility.

The fact that "Henry" does not have generic reference like "you" (which can be rephrased as "one") " and marrying someone is typically not something that recurs shows that sentence cannot be about general possibility.

"Wars can cause casualties" is a statement of general possibility. It is true of wars in the past, present, and future.

"John can get really angry sometimes," despite the definite NP "John," is also a statement of general possibility. He has gotten really angry in the past, and might do so in the future.

Maybe you have a different conception of general possibility?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
Good comments above. Could (and can) it be a matter of context?:

- You're marrying him? Come on. You can do better than that!

This context shows "can" is not necessarily tied to general possibility. Here, it refers to a particular scenario about a particular interlocutor. But in your example, could "can" refer to ability?
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
This context shows "can" is not necessarily tied to general possibility. Here, it refers to a particular scenario about a particular interlocutor. But in your example, could "can" refer to ability?
It does refer to ability. But so would could — the opposite of couldn't, which refers to inability.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
The fact that "Henry" does not have generic reference like "you" (which can be rephrased as "one") " and marrying someone is typically not something that recurs shows that sentence cannot be about general possibility.

Well, I don't think you can say that it 'cannot' be about general possibility. But I agree that it would be (very) odd for a speaker to be thinking of general possibility in a case like this. Where did you get this 'Henry' sentence from?

"Wars can cause casualties" is a statement of general possibility. It is true of wars in the past, present, and future.

Yes, that's a decent example of can for general possibility.

"John can get really angry sometimes," despite the definite NP "John," is also a statement of general possibility. He has gotten really angry in the past, and might do so in the future.

Yes, that's an even better example.

Maybe you have a different conception of general possibility?

No, I don't think so.

It seems that what we're disagreeing on is whether can can be used with the sense of specific possibility rather than its 'normal' sense of general possibility. Is that right?

My response would be that you can find all sorts of irregular uses by native speakers if you look hard enough, so in that sense you're right that it can be used like that, but at the same time, such a use would have to count as irregular, or unusual, or incorrect, or however you want to describe it, because that's simply not what it normally means.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
This context shows "can" is not necessarily tied to general possibility. Here, it refers to a particular scenario about a particular interlocutor. But in your example, could "can" refer to ability?

Yes, I'd say that in this example (Come on! You can do better than that!), can is better understood as having a sense of ability.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Taiwan
Current Location
Taiwan
Well, I don't think you can say that it 'cannot' be about general possibility. But I agree that it would be (very) odd for a speaker to be thinking of general possibility in a case like this. Where did you get this 'Henry' sentence from?

It is modeled on "He could do worse than marry Eleanor" in Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Somone told me "can do worse than V" and "could do worse than V" are freely interchangeable.

My response would be that you can find all sorts of irregular uses by native speakers if you look hard enough, so in that sense you're right that it can be used like that, but at the same time, such a use would have to count as irregular, or unusual, or incorrect, or however you want to describe it, because that's simply not what it normally means.

Could "can do worse than V" be an imitation of "can do better than V"? (Does the latter make more sense than the former?)
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
It is modeled on "He could do worse than marry Eleanor" in Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Somone told me "can do worse than V" and "could do worse than V" are freely interchangeable.

I see. No, they are not freely interchangeable.

Could "can do worse than V" be an imitation of "can do better than V"? (Does the latter make more sense than the former?)

I don't quite understand the question. Imitation? There's little/no point in analysing these structures out of the context of use.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top