There's no vaccine ____ the disease.

Status
Not open for further replies.

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
In my opinion, to is just plain wrong and for is a poor choice. I'd always use against.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
In 69 years I have only heard for.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
To make everyone happy, I have added against. Thanks for letting me know. Is against the most common choice in Canada?
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
I think against is by far the most common choice in Canada. As I said, to my ear to is just wrong in this context.
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Canada is no longer excluded from the poll. Pardon my ignorance. I was simply looking for a wrong answer.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I think we are in agreement that "to" is a wrong answer.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
It doesn't have anything to do with commonest choices, or with any particular region of the world. The obvious answer is for.

You could try to argue that against could make some sense in the context, but there's no reason to think it's a better answer than for, given the limited context we have.

It's not that for and against are two different ways of saying the same thing—it's that they are two ways of saying different things. The sense of for here, as it so often does, relates to special purpose. There are vaccines designed for those diseases, but there isn't one for this one.

Probus—I think you're confusing this context with others that you may have in mind, where against is indeed the correct preposition. Look:

They've been vaccinated against polio.

Here, for is not appropriate, as there is no sense of special purpose. Remember that different prepositions have different meanings.
 
Last edited:

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Vaccine for is 50% more common.

That tells us nothing about the different meanings of the two forms. Sometimes for is correct, and sometimes against is correct.

This then is not a comparison of which preposition is more popular for a specific sense, it is only a (poor) indication of which meaning is more frequent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top