can something be both dusty and damp?

Status
Not open for further replies.

alpacinou

Key Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
Hello.

Can something be both dusty and damp? Is this sentence correct?

The boxes I found in the storage were dusty and smelled of damp.

I thought for a second that when dust settles on something, maybe the smell of damp goes away.
 
Last edited:

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Things can certainly be both damp and dusty.
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Things can certainly be both damp and dusty.

But water will turn the dust to mud.

Alpacinoutd, I think the word you are looking for is musty (for the smell).
 

Tdol

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Sadly, I can assure you from bitter experience that things can get damp, remain damp and also have a layer of dust on top of them.
 

tedmc

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
I think it is only natural that a powdery material like dust when comes into contact with moisture invariably absorbs water through capillary action and becomes moist or damp, just as earth would. If it is damp, it is no longer dust.
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Sadly, I can assure you from bitter experience that things can get damp, remain damp and also have a layer of dust on top of them.
Ugh! No details, please!
 

tedmc

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
This is not a question of English but of science and logic. How can you have dust on a damp surface? Can you have "damp dust"?
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Because damp isn't the same as wet. Sometimes something damp might just feel cold to the touch. It doesn't have to be wet enough to actually mix with dust to make a sort of mushy mess (it would never be called "mud").
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
A google search returns several results for each of "damp and dusty" and "dusty and damp". Oddly enough, the Corpus of Contemporary American English seems to contain neither. Perhaps I'm using the CoCA wrong.
 

emsr2d2

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
I was surprised that CoCA didn't come up with anything. Ngram, however, gives many hits for "damp and dusty" but nowhere near as many for "dusty and damp".

However, bear in mind that certain words not appearing many times in a string on either CoCA or Ngram doesn't mean they don't provide a grammatical sentence when used. Imagine that I have a shiny small car that's red and green with purple spots. It's perfectly reasonable for me to say "I've got a small, shiny, red and green and purple-spotted car". If you put "small, shiny, red and green and purple-spotted" into CoCA, I doubt you'd get any results at all. That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with my sentence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top