No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom

Status
Not open for further replies.

Glizdka

Key Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
This comes from Matura exam in Poland from 2017. All exams from previous years are available on the official website cke.gov.pl, including the one from 2017.

The question in question is 9.1 on page 10. The instruction is in Polish, but it's a very simple one. Chose the sentence closest in meaning to the original.


9.1. No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom.

:cross:A) Tom isn't such a good player as the other boys in the team.

:cross:B) Some boys in the team are better players in the team.

:tick:C) Tom is the best player in the team.


Although C is closest in meaning, it doesn't have the same meaning. The original sentence allows a girl in the team to be better than Tom; option C doesn't.

Here's a modification I suggest:



9.1. No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom.

A) Tom isn't such a good player as the other boys in the team.

B) Some boys in the team are better players in the team.

C*) Tom is the best [STRIKE]player[/STRIKE] boy in the team.



Is my alternative, C*, correct? Does it have the same meaning as the original sentence?
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
This comes from Matura exam in Poland from 2017. All exams from previous years are available on the official website cke.gov.pl, including the one from 2017.

The question in question is 9.1 on page 10. The instruction is in Polish, but it's a very simple one. Chose the sentence closest in meaning to the original.


9.1. No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom.

:cross:A) Tom isn't such a good player as the other boys in the team.

:cross:B) Some boys in the team are better players in the team.

:tick:C) Tom is the best player in the team.


Although C is closest in meaning, it doesn't have the same meaning. The original sentence allows a girl in the team to be better than Tom, option C doesn't.

Here's a modification I suggest:



9.1. No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom.

A) Tom isn't as good a player as the other boys in the team.

B) Some boys in the team are better players [STRIKE]in the team[/STRIKE].

C*) Tom is the best [STRIKE]player[/STRIKE] boy in the team.



Is my alternative, C*, correct? Does it have the same meaning as the original sentence?
You're right. The girls on the team might be better.

Also, in the original sentence, other boys might be just as good as Tom. They're just not better.

So you're right. C is the closest, but it's not the same.
 

Glizdka

Key Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
Also, in the original sentence, other boys might be just as good as Tom. They're just not better.

If two boys, Tom and Ron, are both equally as skillful, and no other boys in the team are better players than Tom and Ron, which of the below are correct?

A) Tom is the best boy in the team.
B) Tom is one of the best boys in the team.
C) Tom is one of the two best boys in the team.
D) Tom and Ron are the best boys in the team.
E) Tom and Ron are the two best boys in the team.

Can/should I change the preposition in to on?
 
Last edited:

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
If two boys, Tom and Ron, are both equally [STRIKE]as[/STRIKE] skillful, and no other boys on the team are better players than Tom and Ron, which of the below are correct?

None of them.


A) Tom is the best boy on the team.

No. Ron is just as good, and others might also be. We only know that no other boys on the team are better.

B) Tom is one of the best boys on the team.

The other boys might be just as good. It might be a great team!


C) Tom is one of the two best boys on the team.

We don't know that. There might be others who are just as good.


D) Tom and Ron are the best boys on the team.

See C.

E) Tom and Ron are the two best boys on the team.

See C.

Can/should I change the preposition in to on?

I beat you to it.
This looks like one of those Mensa logic questions!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

tedmc

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Malaysia
Can you say "boy player" to distinguish it from the girls, if there are any?
 

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Can you say "boy player" to distinguish him from the girls, if there are any?

Yes. Unless you have already mentioned that it's the boys team. (Then it's not necessary.)
 

Charlie Bernstein

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Yes. Unless you have already mentioned that it's the boys team. (Then it's not necessary.)
Right. Gliz caught the gender question right at the start.

The other point is that just because none is better doesn't mean that any are worse. All the boys might be as good as Tom (and Ron). We only know that they're not better.
 

Glizdka

Key Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
I'd like to ask how it works both in logic and in common everyday speech.

I'd expect "No other boy is as good as Tom is" to be commonly understood as "Every other boy is worse than Tom is", but in logic, only to mean "Every other boy is either better or worse than Tom, just not equally good".

I'd analogously expect "No other boy is a better player than Tom" to be commonly understood as "Tom is better than every other boy", but in logic, to mean "Every other boy is either as good as or worse than Tom".

Am I right?


I notice you've corrected one of the three options included in the original test.

"Tom isn't such a good player as the other boys in the team." → "Tom isn't as good a good player as the other boys in the team."

Does it mean "such a(n) [adjective] [noun] as..." is wrong, unlikely, or you just don't like it? It looks odd to me, and it's not something I'd say, but it was in the original test as found on the official website. I've seen them giving ungrammatical options in some questions on purpose. After all, only one option must be correct, and the rest must be wrong; this means they can be ungrammatical as well.
 

GoesStation

No Longer With Us (RIP)
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I notice you've corrected one of the three options included in the original test.

"Tom isn't such a good player as the other boys in the team." → "Tom isn't as good a good player as the other boys in the team."

Does it mean "such a(n) [adjective] [noun] as..." is wrong, unlikely, or you just don't like it?
It's wrong.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I'd expect "No other boy is as good as Tom is" to be commonly understood as "Every other boy is worse than Tom is",

Correct. That's what it means in ordinary language.

but in logic, only to mean "Every other boy is either better or worse than Tom, just not equally good".

What do you mean by 'in logic'? If this were the case, a logician would write such a proposition in logical form to make the meaning unequivocal.
 

Glizdka

Key Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
What do you mean by 'in logic'? If this were the case, a logician would write such a proposition in logical form to make the meaning unequivocal.
You caught me off guard. I know logic only from math.

Can I do like a mathematician would?
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
What do you mean?
 

Glizdka

Key Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
I used the word logic a bit too carelessly. When you said about a proposition in logical form, I realized I couldn't deliver. I've never studied logic except for in math.

Would a semanticist understand a mathematician?


let:
T
- team, set of boys
a - Tom, a boy
x - boy other than Tom
prowess at sport be value of variable

T={a, x1, x2, x3, ... xn-1}
a∈T
x∈{T\a}

"No other boy is a better player than Tom" means "Every other boy is worse than Tom" and "Tom is the best boy in the team".

∀x∈{T\a}:x≯ a ↔ x<a ↔ a>x


"No other boy is a better player than Tom" means "Every other boy is either worse than or as good as Tom", but it doesn't imply that "Tom is the best boy in the team" because "There may be a boy in the team that is as good as Tom".

∀x∈{T\a}:(x≯ a ↔ x≤a ↔ x<a ∨ x=a) ↛ a>x ∵ ∃'x∈{T\a}:x=a


"Tom is the best boy in the team" implies that "No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom".

∀x∈{T\a}:a>x → x≯ a
 
Last edited:

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I'm not sure what you're asking or why, Glizdka.

What is it that you're trying to learn with all this?
 

Glizdka

Key Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
I've reworked post#14. It was unreadable. I hope it's clearer now.

I'm not sure what you're asking or why, Glizdka.

What is it that you're trying to learn with all this?

Are these true?

A) "No other boy is a better player than Tom" means "Every other boy is worse than Tom" and "Tom is the best boy in the team".
B) "No other boy is a better player than Tom" means "Every other boy is either worse than or as good as Tom", but it doesn't imply that "Tom is the best boy in the team" because "There may be a boy in the team that is as good as Tom".
C) "Tom is the best boy in the team" implies that "No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom".
 
Last edited:

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Is anybody else's head spinning?:turn-l:
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
You're not using the word imply quite right. What you mean is entail.
 

Glizdka

Key Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2019
Member Type
Other
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
Poland
C) It does not just imply that.
You're not using the word imply quite right. What you mean is entail.

I've changed imply to entail. Are these true?

C1) "Tom is the best boy in the team" entails "No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom".
a>x → x≯ a

C2) "No other boy in the team is a better player than Tom" doesn't entail "Tom is the best boy in the team".
x≯ a ↛ a>x
 
Last edited:

Tarheel

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I know what sentence we're discussing. I also know it's rather unnatural. If somebody wants to say Tom is the best player on the team they will usually say exactly that. "Tom is the best player on the team" leaves no doubt about what is meant, and it is the normal way to say it. Since this is an ESL website, I would encourage people to say it that way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top