Is this correct and natural?
She trudged up the muddy path to reach a flat area overlooking the city. The whole city bloomed bright beneath her. The noisy, flashy city she could never love. She was born and raised here but it had never been her home. It would never be. The wind blew somberly, ruffling the naked trees to her right.
Last edited by alpacinoutd; 04-Mar-2021 at 20:04.
It's as good a place as any for trudged.
In the second sentence, "bloomed bright" is a nice touch.
Finally, I might say:
She had been born and raised there, but it had never felt like home, and it never would.
I don't know if "Is it natural?" is the right question when you are trying to be creative, as you clearly are.
Creative writing is always in a sense unnatural, because you are trying to be original. Having said that, you can say something in a creative way and still make it seem just right.
It's s good effort.
Not a professional teacher
The wind blew somberly, ruffling the naked trees to her right.
That's changes the tone of the piece in my opinion. It also personifies wind for some unknown reason.
Not a professional teacher
One more thing. Yankee is right. You don't need whole before city.
Not a professional teacher
I'm not a teacher. I speak American English. I've tutored writing at the University of Southern Maine and have done a good deal of copy editing and writing, occasionally for publication.
In several countries, a city and a town are different things. I would get rid of the repetition of "city" by saying something like:
... to a flat area overlooking the city, which bloomed bright beneath her.
Remember - if you don't use correct capitalisation, punctuation and spacing, anything you write will be incorrect.
I'm not a teacher. I speak American English. I've tutored writing at the University of Southern Maine and have done a good deal of copy editing and writing, occasionally for publication.