[Idiom] To his own cost / at his own expence

Status
Not open for further replies.

Giulia

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
Hello,

I was wondering about the difference between to his own cost / at his own expense / at a high price.

Is this sentence correct?

"He learned to his own cost that the future could not be planned"

Would American English and British English people say this in the same way?

Thank you.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Where did you come across the phrase to his own cost?

Can you show us the dictionary entry or the text in which you saw this?
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Thank you. Please provide the source of any sentences you ask about in your original post. If you make up the sentences yourself, let us know this too.

Yes, the sentence in post #1 is fine in both British and American English.
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
As for the difference, to his own cost means that he suffered bad consequences, while at his own expense just means he bore the expense of something. In that case the thing could have been either good or bad.
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
"He learned to his own cost that the future could not be planned"

I can't find that sentence on the page you linked us to. I would delete 'own'.
 

Giulia

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Italian
Home Country
Italy
Current Location
Italy
The sentence is mine. I am translating a text and was looking for the correct expression to use.

Doesn't "own" give a stronger meaning? Or is it unnecessary in this case?
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
I would delete 'own'.

If "to his cost" was by itself I would certainly agree with omitting own. But in conjunction with at his own expense doesn't parallelism argue for keeping it?
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
If "to his cost" was by itself I would certainly agree with omitting own. But in conjunction with at his own expense doesn't parallelism argue for keeping it?

What parallelism? The phrase at his own expense doesn't come into it. This is a translation from an unknown Italian phrase. We just have to assume that Giulia is correct in thinking that the sentence with to his own cost is a good translation of whatever the Italian one is.
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
Hello,

I was wondering about the difference between to his own cost / at his own expense / at a high price.

That is the question I was trying to answer. With respect, jutfrank, to his own cost clearly does form part of the question. I corrected to to at.
 

jutfrank

VIP Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
That is the question I was trying to answer. With respect, jutfrank, to his own cost clearly does form part of the question. I corrected to to at.

Okay, I think I see what you mean now.

Well, I think you're right that at his own cost could be equivalent to at his own expense, such as in:

He paid for the party at his own expense.
He paid for the party at his own cost.

These both mean he spent his own money. There's no sense that he suffered in any way. (I'm not certain about the second, but I think it seems okay.)

But, to his own cost has a quite different sense, in that it means the person has had a bad deal in some way.

Do I understand you correctly, probus? If so, yes, I agree.
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
We are in full agreement jutfrank.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top