Results 1 to 2 of 2
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Malaysia
      • Current Location:
      • Malaysia

    • Join Date: Dec 2006
    • Posts: 1,277
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    had worked / had been working

    Mr Harrington had been working for 2 weeks by the time he eventually finished the report.

    Mr Harrington had worked for 2 weeks by the time he eventually finished the report.

    Is there any difference in meaning?

    Thanks in advance.


    • Join Date: Mar 2007
    • Posts: 128
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: had worked / had been working

    Yes and No.

    The first version might imply that he had been working non-stop on that particular report. It might also imply that previously he had not been working, but that he had been working for at least the last two weeks.

    The second version might imply that he had only been with the company for 2 weeks but may well have worked on other things apart from the report he delivered.

    Neither version are particularly explicit though, so no particular inference can DEFINITELY be implied.

Similar Threads

  1. have worked / have been working
    By Unregistered in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-Mar-2007, 12:05
  2. Ielts Essay Correction Working As A Team
    By dadimo in forum Editing & Writing Topics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29-Jan-2007, 21:35
  3. worked on
    By Hanka in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-Aug-2006, 17:06
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-Apr-2006, 07:36

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •