Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Newbie
    Student or Learner

    • Join Date: Jul 2007
    • Posts: 1


    In the English language what is the correct way to discribe phrases like:
    you should have come, and not you should have came; he did not go, and not he did not went; How do I explain why the grammer is like this?
    Last edited by Jaygee; 24-Jul-2007 at 20:12. Reason: The letter I was missed out

  2. Casiopea's Avatar

    • Join Date: Sep 2003
    • Posts: 12,970

    Re: Jaygee

    The verb have takes a past participle, as in [1]. In [2], came is not a past participle. It's the past tense of the verb come:

    [1] You should have come. <past participle>
    [2] You should have came. <past tense>

    In English, only one verb per simple sentence can carry tense, as in [3]: the verb did carries tense, and the bare infinitive verb go doesn't carry tense. In [4], there are two tense-carrying verbs: did and went:

    [3] He did not go.
    [4] He did not went.

    Does that help?


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts