.Please, I need help with my style and grammar, I would appreciate it if you could comment on my review about a book that I have just read. Thank you!
The shelters of stone
“The Shelters of Stone”, which puts [brings to] an end the five-book saga “The Earth’s Children”, represents the peak of Jean M. Auel’s career.
In this historic ["historic" means "famous in history". The term you may want is "historical novel"] book Ayla and Jondalar arrive at Jondalar’s home after a year’s travel in which they have acquired a big amount [a large amount OR a great deal] of knowledge. At the stone shelter, where Jondalar’s family live, they will share all their experiences with those who will be soon their family.
This novel can be found either in paperback or hardback. The storyline is divided into unnamed chapters; that provides a pinch of expectation as you do not now [know] what else [unnecessary - delete] will happen. No illustrations are needed, although, as in every book of the saga, the reader can find a map of the [unnecessary - delete] prehistoric Europe shown [either "printed" OR delete] in the book.
Through this novel an idea of how life was during the prehistoric age can be achieved [acquired/gained]. Furthermore Auel writes about the techniques that are bound to have been discovered ¿? during the storyline. However, since the plot, continues to be the same as in the previous books the novel of 920 pages is hard to read. To say this is to mean that each book has exactly the same series of events and characters. I think you need to reconsider this sentence.
To sum up, despite its good qualities “The Shelters of Stone” does not achieve the level of expectation [expectation = belief that something will happen - is this what you meant?]shown in the rest of the saga. Auel could make feel disillusioned to[disillusion] those who have already read the previous four fair [unnecessary - delete]best sellers.
Student or Learner