Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Unregistered
    Guest
    #1

    will vs. would

    I encountered the following sentence, and I was
    wondering if the sequence of tenses in the sentence was
    used correctly.

    The sentence goes;
    ---------------------------------------------------
    But, as VOA's Amy Bickers explains, Mr. Koizumi told
    reporters that Tokyo will listen sincerely to criticism of the
    textbook, and try to improve Japan-China ties by finding
    ways to understand the two sides' positions on the issue.
    ---------------------------------------------------

    I thought that "Tokyo will" should be "Tokyo would", because
    the former verb, "told" is used in the past tense, consequently,
    will should be would. Am I understanding English grammar
    properly?

    I would appreciate it very much if you could give me your
    comment at your convenience.

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • UK
      • Current Location:
      • Laos

    • Join Date: Nov 2002
    • Posts: 52,423
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: will vs. would

    If the thing being reported is a fact and always true, or still true at the time of reporting, we often don't backshift the verb.
    'My name's Paul.'
    He said his name is/was Paul.
    Here, as long as we believe him, we will often keep the verb in the present tense.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •