"I'd hate for you to think I didn't know what I was doing."
Apparently, somebody thinks that is bad grammar. Unfortunately, I only get to vote once. :wink:
8)
Interested in Language
View Poll Results: Is "I'd hate it for you to think ..." good grammar?
- Voters
- 9. This poll is closed
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
- Join Date: Nov 2002
- Posts: 3,742
#1 22-May-2003, 13:41"I'd hate it for you to think ..."
This was questioned in https://www.usingenglish.com/forum/v...hp?p=2911#2911
I'm not a teacher, so please consider any advice I give in that context.
-
-
Moderator
Other
- Join Date: Feb 2003
- Posts: 16,546
#2 22-May-2003, 14:00Re: "I'd hate it for you to think ..."
-
Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
Interested in Language
- Join Date: Nov 2002
- Posts: 3,742
#3 22-May-2003, 14:04Re: "I'd hate it for you to think ..."
Did you see the stray it?
I'm not a teacher, so please consider any advice I give in that context.
-
Moderator
Other
- Join Date: Feb 2003
- Posts: 16,546
#4 22-May-2003, 14:22Re: "I'd hate it for you to think ..."
Not until you pointed it out.
Originally Posted by Red5
(Another example, I suppose, of the brain seeing what it expects to see. Somebody might have to change his vote. :wink: )
8)
-
Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
Interested in Language
- Join Date: Nov 2002
- Posts: 3,742
#5 18-Aug-2003, 09:40It's not exactly a clear cut vote, here!
I'm not a teacher, so please consider any advice I give in that context.
-
WillGuest#6 18-Aug-2003, 20:29
I voted yes. I don't personally see anything wrong with it.
-
Editor, UsingEnglish.com
English Teacher
- Join Date: Nov 2002
- Posts: 66,864
#7 18-Aug-2003, 21:41It could be improved:
I'd hate you to think.
Clearer and fewer words.
