Results 1 to 5 of 5

    • Join Date: Jul 2005
    • Posts: 928
    #1

    simple past

    Hi,

    could you please tell me whether it is possible to use simple past in the following sentence when talking of a hypothetical situation which may or may not happen in the future:

    In such case, the client shall also be entitled to use the retained part of the payment to cover the costs incurred by him as a result of the fact that the outstanding works had to be completed by a different business partner.

    Thanks a lot!

    Hanka


    • Join Date: Nov 2007
    • Posts: 5,409
    #2

    Re: simple past

    In such case, the client shall also be entitled to use the retained part of the payment to cover the costs incurred by him as a result of the fact that the outstanding works had to be completed by a different business partner.

    In such cases,
    or
    In such a case, the client shall also be entitled to use the retained part of the payment to cover the costs incurred by him as a result of the fact that the outstanding works had to be completed by a different business partner.

    Quite correct, assuming (which is probable) that the works have been completed, so that is also in the past.


    • Join Date: Jul 2005
    • Posts: 928
    #3

    Re: simple past

    Quote Originally Posted by David L. View Post
    In such case, the client shall also be entitled to use the retained part of the payment to cover the costs incurred by him as a result of the fact that the outstanding works had to be completed by a different business partner.

    In such cases,
    or
    In such a case, the client shall also be entitled to use the retained part of the payment to cover the costs incurred by him as a result of the fact that the outstanding works had to be completed by a different business partner.

    Quite correct, assuming (which is probable) that the works have been completed, so that is also in the past.
    This is a contractual provision, so none of the activities described in the contract have not happened yet and maybe will not happen at all. This sentence just says that if something happens after the parties sign the contract, then the client shall be entitled to do something. At the moment when the parties sign the contract, nothing is past, so I am a bit confused.


    • Join Date: Nov 2007
    • Posts: 5,409
    #4

    Re: simple past

    Then what about:

    In such cases,
    or
    In such a case, the client shall also be entitled to use the retained part of the payment to cover the costs incurred by him iin the event that the outstanding works have to be completed by a different business partner.

    I like it!


    • Join Date: Jul 2005
    • Posts: 928
    #5

    Re: simple past

    Yes, I like it, too!!!!!!!

Similar Threads

  1. Is Yesterday a past time?
    By shun in forum General Language Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13-Feb-2008, 19:54
  2. simple past - past perfect continuous interrogativedifferences
    By Unregistered9996 in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26-Dec-2007, 04:05
  3. A strange use of tense
    By shun in forum Linguistics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 18-Sep-2006, 02:45
  4. Simple past versus past perfect or pluperfect
    By chrisalor in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-Sep-2006, 20:59
  5. Simple Past - questionnaire for teachers
    By Renatask in forum Teaching English
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-Aug-2006, 12:24

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •