Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. Senior Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Arabic
      • Home Country:
      • Malaysia
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong

    • Join Date: Sep 2007
    • Posts: 823
    #1

    flaw

    Hi there,

    Is it correct to say like this?

    1. His essays are full of flaws in sentence structures.
    2. The main flaw in his essay is the sentence structures.

    Thanks
    pete

  2. Neillythere's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Thailand

    • Join Date: Mar 2008
    • Posts: 537
    #2

    Re: flaw

    Hi.

    Item 1 reads OK, but Item 2 has me concerned about: "The main flaw in his essay is the sentence structures" i.e. combining singular with plural.

    I'm not a teacher, but, anyone actually using such comments should be very cogniscent of their effect on the student.

    We are in the process of doing annual appraisals at the moment and one of the things that we emphasise is that it is better to be positive, rather than critical when reviewing people's work.

    On a "Writing Job Descriptions" course, recently, we were advised that it can cost over 7 times an employee's annual salary to replace them - and there's a currently a major shortage of 30-40+ year olds available in our industry to take the place of those planning on retiring soon. We therefore really have to consider training before criticism.

    In your examples, you may wish to suggest something such as: "..... could benefit significantly from extra [detailed] training and practice in sentence structure".

    It's a subtle change, but it could make all the difference to whether the student looks ahead in a positive manner or is just totally "turned off" by a negative comment.

    Saying that the work, on which someone has possibly spent a lot of time & effort, is "full of flaws" could totally demoralise a student and turn them of their studies.

    What do you think?

  3. Senior Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Arabic
      • Home Country:
      • Malaysia
      • Current Location:
      • Hong Kong

    • Join Date: Sep 2007
    • Posts: 823
    #3

    Re: flaw

    Hi there,

    Thanks a lot.

    Is it ok to say like this?

    You (could OR can) benefit significantly from more practice (in / on) sentence structures.

    Thanks
    pete

  4. Neillythere's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Thailand

    • Join Date: Mar 2008
    • Posts: 537
    #4

    Re: flaw

    I would probably prefer:

    "You could probably benefit significantly from more training/practice (in/with) sentence structures".

    Practice on its own is insufficient. It appears the student will need some training-type assistance to solve the problem.

    The problem with using "can" is that it presumes capabilities that the student may not have.

    Regards


    • Join Date: Nov 2007
    • Posts: 5,409
    #5

    Re: flaw

    Is 'flaw' the word to use in this context?
    a 'flaw' is a 'blemish' , an 'imperfection' that detracts from the quality, especially of a work of art or other artistic creation, a gem, a carefully contrived plot or plan etc
    In terms of writing sentences and their structure,
    1. His essays are full of errors in sentence structure. (singular)
    2. The main shortcoming in his essay is the sentence structure. (singular)

  5. Neillythere's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Thailand

    • Join Date: Mar 2008
    • Posts: 537
    #6

    Re: flaw

    If the sentences concerned were examples from the student, I would have no problem agreeing with David, as there would be no implied "destructive" rather than "constructive" criticism from a tutor involved.

    If however the sentences were the tutor's comments on a student's work, I would be concerned, as previously noted.

    I personally wouldn't be so worried by the word "flaw" as such, since, if a student's essay expressed a brilliant new slant on an old problem, but was difficult to read (as a result of poor sentence structure) I could consider the latter, in David's words, as a blemish on an otherwise excellent essay.

    Regards

  6. stuartnz's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • New Zealand
      • Current Location:
      • New Zealand

    • Join Date: Mar 2008
    • Posts: 1,370
    #7

    Re: flaw

    Quote Originally Posted by Neillythere View Post
    I personally wouldn't be so worried by the word "flaw" as such, since, if a student's essay expressed a brilliant new slant on an old problem, but was difficult to read (as a result of poor sentence structure) I could consider the latter, in David's words, as a blemish on an otherwise excellent essay.

    Regards
    One phrase my teachers used to use a lot with me was "let down by", as in "Your essay had some interesting thoughts, but you let yourself down with that 104-word sentence" (I had just read Milton's record holder, and had tried to emulate him).

  7. Neillythere's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Thailand

    • Join Date: Mar 2008
    • Posts: 537
    #8

    Re: flaw

    Yes, I believe that your teachers were in fact trying to be constructive at that time. "Let down by" suggests that your work was otherwise excellent!

    They obviously hadn't realised your emulation of a Grand Master of the English language.

    Me? I'm afraid that, although I "accidentally" acquired 4 language O-levels (by moving to the right place at the right time), I failed English Literature.


    • Join Date: Nov 2007
    • Posts: 5,409
    #9

    Re: flaw

    if a student's essay expressed a brilliant new slant on an old problem, but was difficult to read (as a result of poor sentence structure) I could consider the latter, in David's words, as a blemish on an otherwise excellent essay.

    Neillythere: Would anyone have considered Einstein's handwritten draft of Theory of Relativity to be 'flawed'' because he made spelling mistakes or errors in sentence structure??
    Last edited by David L.; 22-Mar-2008 at 13:50.

  8. Neillythere's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • England
      • Current Location:
      • Thailand

    • Join Date: Mar 2008
    • Posts: 537
    #10

    Re: flaw

    No, it wouldn't have been a flaw in the theory itself, but it might have been considered by some as a blemish in the presentation of his theory if it distracted people from understanding the intent of his theory.

    The fewer such blemishes the easier it is for people to read and appreciate.

    Regards

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •