Results 1 to 5 of 5
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Sep 2007
    • Posts: 40
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #1

    were trying vs. have been trying

    Hi all,

    Following is the article extracted from antropological text book.

    --------
    We. all know waht culture is. Or do we? Can you define culture? If you can't, don't worry. You're in good company. For the entire history of anthropology, a continual project has been to try to come up with just such a definition. One reason for the difficulty is simply that the phenomenon of culture is so complex. The second reason is that, until recently, we were trying to define culture in a way that made it our species' unique possession.
    --------
    If above red-colored thing was substituted with "have been trying to", how would it sound like, comparing the original one.

    Thanks, :)

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • British English
      • Home Country:
      • Scotland
      • Current Location:
      • Thailand

    • Join Date: Nov 2007
    • Posts: 325
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #2

    Re: were trying vs. have been trying

    Replacing the text with "have been trying" wouldn't work because the meanings are different.

    "Were trying" is past continuous and means that you are no longer trying.
    "Have been trying" is present perfect continuous and means you are still trying.

  1. beascarpetta's Avatar
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Great Britain
      • Current Location:
      • Austria

    • Join Date: Oct 2007
    • Posts: 2,331
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #3

    Re: were trying vs. have been trying

    The second reason is that, until recently, we were trying to define culture in a way that made it our species' unique possession.


    I don't think that you can actually substitute we were trying because "recently" ties the action in progress to the past. (just gut feeling )


    • Join Date: Nov 2007
    • Posts: 5,409
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #4

    Re: were trying vs. have been trying

    I don't think that you can actually substitute we were trying because "recently" ties the action in progress to the past.

    Just to be absolutely clear: I'm sure beascarpetta means you can't subsitutute 'have been trying' for 'were trying' because 'recently' is used.

    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Korean
      • Home Country:
      • South Korea
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Sep 2007
    • Posts: 40
    • Post Thanks / Like
    #5

    Re: were trying vs. have been trying

    Then how about "had been trying"???

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •