Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Key Member
    Student or Learner
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Portuguese
      • Home Country:
      • Tuvalu
      • Current Location:
      • Tuvalu

    • Join Date: Oct 2007
    • Posts: 1,860

    ''that we published''

    "The main reason that we published this is because we thought that this was an important lesson."

    Is this good English, please? How about "the main reason for us to publish..."?

  2. Senior Member
    English Teacher
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Oct 2008
    • Posts: 907

    Re: ''that we published''

    Dear jctgf:

    Yes, your alternative would work, although that we published is better, because it lets the reader know that the company did, in fact, publish whatever it was they're referring to.
    The main reason for us to publish does not actually say that they published it, just that there was a main reason to do so.
    Were I the author, I think I'd write:
    'The main (or, 'primary') reason we published this is that we thought it was a good lesson.'

    I hope this is helpful,

Similar Threads

  1. To publish or to have published
    By Abusaad in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 16-Dec-2004, 10:51
  2. adding ed
    By jack in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: 13-Dec-2004, 11:21
  3. When did using English first published?
    By Latoof in forum Comments & Suggestions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-Nov-2004, 10:54
  4. had been already OR was already; best 5(th)
    By Wai_Wai in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 17-Oct-2004, 20:16
  5. published in vs pulished on
    By Anonymous in forum Ask a Teacher
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-Aug-2003, 22:22


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts