Results 1 to 10 of 10

    • Join Date: Nov 2005
    • Posts: 6
    #1

    Question et al's or et als'

    Should I put the apostrophe before or after the s with et al? e.g.

    In support of Alderson et alís (2004) findings...

    Surely this should be et als' as 'Anderson et al' refers to multiple people?

    Thanks,

    Richard.

  1. Barb_D's Avatar
    Moderator
    Other
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Mar 2007
    • Posts: 19,269
    #2

    Re: et al's or et als'

    It's just "et al" - don't try to make it plural.

  2. Offroad's Avatar
    Key Member
    Interested in Language
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Brazilian Portuguese
      • Home Country:
      • Brazil
      • Current Location:
      • Brazil

    • Join Date: Feb 2008
    • Posts: 2,817
    #3

    Re: et al's or et als'

    Fully agreed. No need for the 's', however, as it is possible to find 'I seen', it is also possible to find 'et als'.


    • Join Date: Nov 2005
    • Posts: 6
    #4

    Re: et al's or et als'

    Thanks for your replies.

    So 'In support of Alderson et al (2004) findings...' is fine? It just looks a bit wrong without the s.

    Richard.

  3. Member
    English Teacher
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Italian
      • Home Country:
      • Italy
      • Current Location:
      • Italy

    • Join Date: Aug 2008
    • Posts: 353
    #5

    Re: et al's or et als'

    Since 'et al.' is short for et alii (= literally "and other persons") why not use a more 'Germanic' solution instead of a Latin phrase?

    'In support of Alderson and other experts'/scholars'/scientists' findings?

  4. Barb_D's Avatar
    Moderator
    Other
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • American English
      • Home Country:
      • United States
      • Current Location:
      • United States

    • Join Date: Mar 2007
    • Posts: 19,269
    #6

    Re: et al's or et als'

    I only belated realized you wanted to use that as a possessive. I'd advise not trying to do so.

    The findings of X et al (2004).

  5. #7

    Re: et al's or et als'

    To avoid confusions, I would write like:

    In support of Alderson and colleagues/co-workers' findings [Alderson et al., 2004], ...

    where [Alderson et al., 2004] is a citation. It may also take the form
    (Alderson et al., 2004), [1], (1), etc. depending on the citation style that you use.

    In the "References/Bibliography" section, you will have a reference entry like:

    A. Alderson, B. Smith, C. Jones, and D. Roberts, "Recent Findings on ABC", Journal of XYZ, volume 100, pages 50-60, 2004.

  6. Raymott's Avatar
    VIP Member
    Academic
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Australia
      • Current Location:
      • Australia

    • Join Date: Jun 2008
    • Posts: 24,619
    #8

    Re: et al's or et als'

    Quote Originally Posted by zeyarag View Post
    In support of Alderson and colleagues/co-workers' findings [Alderson et al., 2004], ...
    In support of Alderson and colleagues' findings (2004), ...
    I don't know of any style guides that would require you to write 'Anderson' twice in this context.
    But this correction is still inferior to Barb's simple solution.

  7. Offroad's Avatar
    Key Member
    Interested in Language
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • Brazilian Portuguese
      • Home Country:
      • Brazil
      • Current Location:
      • Brazil

    • Join Date: Feb 2008
    • Posts: 2,817
    #9

    Re: et al's or et als'

    Quote Originally Posted by Barb_D View Post
    I only belated realized you wanted to use that as a possessive. I'd advise not trying to do so.

    The findings of X et al (2004).
    I've been researching for almost one decade, and I have never seen an author and his/her colaborators be addressed like that.

    So, I reinforce what Barb has said.

  8. konungursvia's Avatar
    VIP Member
    Academic
    • Member Info
      • Native Language:
      • English
      • Home Country:
      • Canada
      • Current Location:
      • Canada

    • Join Date: Mar 2009
    • Posts: 5,158
    #10

    Re: et al's or et als'

    Quote Originally Posted by marciobarbalho View Post
    I've been researching for almost one decade, and I have never seen an author and his/her colaborators be addressed like that.

    So, I reinforce what Barb has said.
    The findings of X et al. seems fine to me.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •