• Exciting news! With our new Ad-Free Premium Subscription you can enjoy a distraction-free browsing experience while supporting our site's growth. Without ads, you have less distractions and enjoy faster page load times. Upgrade is optional. Find out more here, and enjoy ad-free learning with us!

Appreciate

Status
Not open for further replies.
U

Unregistered

Guest
Dear Sir/Madam,

My name is Somnieng. I am from Cambodia, a Cambodian. I appreciate in advance for any help from you. I have been learning English a few years (not intensively). Today, i have something in my mind that i need to explore reasonably to ease my doubt. What is the distinguishments between ''He helps me understand.....and He helps me to understand'' ''He wants me understand and he wants me to understand''. How can i understand the basic grammar on this area, if i see many same or similar cases.....


Again, appreciate deeply!

Somnieng
Cambodia
 

naomimalan

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
'He helps me understand.....and He helps me to understand''
Both are correct.

''He wants me understand and he wants me to understand''
You can't say "He wants me understand." It's wrong.

If you can't find the rules in the English Grammar Glossary on this site, you can find them in the grammar book, "English Grammar in Use", by Raymond Murphy. In the index at the back, you look for the word you want and you will find the page (all the words in this area are on the same page).
 

puzzle

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
naomimalan:'He wants me understand and he wants me to understand''
You can't say "He wants me understand." It's wrong.

:?:What's wrong with " he wants me understand" ? Please.
 

David L.

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Member Type
Other
What's wrong with " he wants me understand" ? Please.

It's incorrect grammar, just as "He helps me understand" is incorrect.

You will hear and see examples of this in everyday speech and in what you read on the Internet eg I had went to the shop and I seen him there.

The correct phrasing is:
He helps me to understand...
He wants me to understand...
 

banderas

Key Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
UK
I would like ask David and Naomimalan about help me (to)-structure.

He helps me to understand... or he helps me understand?

it is said that both versions are ok and it is a matter of personal choice which one you use. It is also believed that structure without "to" is more Amercian than BrE. I am not sure:roll:,... anyway.
Do not you think that there must be a slight difference in usage?

My idea is that we use "to" in the following example: "he helps me to loose weight" because it is not an immidiate task. Like "to do list" is a list of things to get done but usually not right now.
If an immidiate task is involved then we say: he helps me tidy the room.

What do you think?:-?
 

David L.

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Member Type
Other
The infinitive may be preceded by 'to' , or it may stand alone.

The to-infinitive form is used:
a. after certain verbs. e.g. want, wish, agree, fail, mean, decide, learn
b. after the auxiliaries 'to be to', 'to have to', and 'ought to'
c. in the pattern 'it is + adjective + to-infinitive'

Examples with 'to' :

The elephant decided to marry the mouse
The mouse agreed to marry the elephant
You will have to ask her
You are to leave immediately
He ought to relax
She has to go to Berlin next week
It's easy to speak English
It is hard to change jobs after twenty years
It's stupid to believe everything you hear

without 'to'

I would rather visit Rome.
She would rather live in Italy.
Would you rather eat steak or fish?
He would rather work in a bank.
I'd rather be a forest than a tree.
 
Last edited:

banderas

Key Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
UK
The infinitive may be preceded by 'to' , or it may stand alone.

The to-infinitive form is used:
a. after certain verbs. e.g. want, wish, agree, fail, mean, decide, learn, understand
b. after the auxiliaries 'to be to', 'to have to', and 'ought to'
c. in the pattern 'it is + adjective + to-infinitive'

Examples with 'to' :

The elephant decided to marry the mouse
The mouse agreed to marry the elephant
You will have to ask her
You are to leave immediately
He ought to relax
She has to go to Berlin next week
It's easy to speak English
It is hard to change jobs after twenty years
It's stupid to believe everything you hear

without 'to'

I would rather visit Rome.
She would rather live in Italy.
Would you rather eat steak or fish?
He would rather work in a bank.
I'd rather be a forest than a tree.
Thanks for reminding me these rules;-) but my concern is that Raymond Murphy said: "After help you can use infinitive with ot without to", source: "English Grammar in Use", Cambridge University Press, page 108. He did not specify when you do and when you don't use "to".
 

banderas

Key Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
UK
David, I swear you replied me and now it looks like your reply dissapeared...:-?.
After the object after certain verbs, such as hear, see, make, let, there is no to:
  • I saw him pour the medicine down the loo and I heard him laugh to himself.

  • I cannot make you take this medication, I can only ask you to take it.

  • I can't let you go to bed hungry. You must let me prepare you some supper.
"help" is not included in this group of verbs. I am still confused...:-?source:Learning English | BBC World Service
 

banderas

Key Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Polish
Home Country
Poland
Current Location
UK
Raymond Murphy said: "After help you can use infinitive with ot without to", source: "English Grammar in Use", Cambridge University Press, page 108. He did not specify when you do and when you don't use "to".

any idea,please?
 

naomimalan

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
I would like ask David and Naomimalan about help me (to)-structure.

He helps me to understand... or he helps me understand?

it is said that both versions are ok and it is a matter of personal choice which one you use. It is also believed that structure without "to" is more Amercian than BrE. I am not sure:roll:,... anyway.
Do not you think that there must be a slight difference in usage?

My idea is that we use "to" in the following example: "he helps me to loose weight" because it is not an immidiate task. Like "to do list" is a list of things to get done but usually not right now.
If an immidiate task is involved then we say: he helps me tidy the room.
What do you think?:-?

I have eight grammar books (including the Raymond Murphy grammar you mention). They all say that both forms are acceptable. None of them make(s) any distinction between the two forms as regards meaning. One of them* confirms what you say, Banderas, that the bare infinitive form is what he calls an “Americanism”.

Apart from Raymond Murphy, who is very reliable, I shall just refer to the two authorities on English Grammar:

Thomson and Martinet, “A Practical English Grammar”, Fourth Edition, para 246H: “Help may be followed by a full or bare infinitive: He helped us (to) push it.

Raymond Quirk et al, “A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language” (1992), : Type (iii) [help, know] is a residual class of two verbs which are optionally followed by a to-infinitive.

(iii) Sarah helped us (to) edit the script.
I have known John (to) give better speeches than that.

(Your idea about an immediate task is interesting but I don't think it applies here.),:-D:-D




*Grammaire Pratique de l’Anglais : S. Berland –Delépine (Ophrys 1990), para 299.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top