as many

Status
Not open for further replies.

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
Can one say:

1-"I lost as much as you did."

instead of:

2-"I lost as many times as you did."

We have played a series of games or something.
 

twostep

Senior Member
Joined
May 10, 2004
navi tasan said:
Can one say:

1-"I lost as much as you did."

instead of:

2-"I lost as many times as you did."

We have played a series of games or something.

I am not a teacher.

1 = I lost as much money as you did.
2 = I lost as many games as you did.
 

blacknomi

Key Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Member Type
Student or Learner
navi tasan said:
Can one say:

1-"I lost as much as you did."

instead of:

2-"I lost as many times as you did."

We have played a series of games or something.


I lost as much as you did.
==> 'much' functions as an adverb to modify the main verb 'lost'. You might lose money, what twostep said.


I lost as many times as you did.
==> 'many times' is used to talk about quantity.

:wink:
 

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
I lost 50 times. You lost 40 times.
A-I lost more than you did.
(Do I have to say "more times")

B-I lost 40 times. You lost 50 times.
I lost less than you did.
(Do I have to say "fewer times")

C-I lost 50 times. You lost 50 times.
I lost as much as you did.
(Do I have to say "as many times"?)

You guys seem to think yes. I'd like to know what the teachers think.
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
blacknomi said:
I lost as much as you did.
==> 'much' functions as an adverb to modify the main verb 'lost'. You might lose money, what twostep said.


I lost as many times as you did.
==> 'many times' is used to talk about quantity.

:wink:

The problem with "much" is that it can also be a noun. It could be an adverb (as frequently) or a noun (as much money, time, respect etc.)

If one wants the adverbial use, "often" would probably be better in this construction. :wink:
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
navi tasan said:
I lost 50 times. You lost 40 times.
A-I lost more than you did.
(Do I have to say "more times")

B-I lost 40 times. You lost 50 times.
I lost less than you did.
(Do I have to say "fewer times")

C-I lost 50 times. You lost 50 times.
I lost as much as you did.
(Do I have to say "as many times"?)

You guys seem to think yes. I'd like to know what the teachers think.

A. OK, but more often is more clear.
B. OK, but less often is more clear.
C. OK, but often would be more clear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top