'be going to' and present progressive

Status
Not open for further replies.

peter123

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Arabic
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Hong Kong
Hi teachers,
Please help if my explanations are correct or not.

You're not wearing that skirt to school? (enquire about my arranged action)

You're not wearing that skirt to school! (surprised about my arranged action)

You're not going to wear that skirt to school? (enquire about my decided action)

You're not going to wear that skirt to school! (surprised about my decided action)


thank you for much.
pete


 

MrPedantic

Key Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I would say that those were fair interpretations, and that yes, "be going to" can imply a planned action.

Other contexts might provide other interpretations, however. Thus

1. You're not going to wear that skirt to school?

could suggest mild surprise, if the girl isn't wearing the skirt in question; while if she is,

2. You're not going to wear that skirt to school!

could suggest outrage and disapproval.

Best wishes,

MrP
 

peter123

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Arabic
Home Country
Malaysia
Current Location
Hong Kong
Hi there,

Thanks so much. Your answers are very helpful. I want to ask one more question.

What is the difference in meaning between the present progressive and 'be going to' in the following sentences? Are they interchangable in these two examples?
You're not wearing that skirt to school!

You're not going to wear that skirt to school!

Thanks in advance.
Pete
 

5jj

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
British English
Home Country
Czech Republic
Current Location
Czech Republic
What is the difference in meaning between the present progressive and 'be going to' in the following sentences? Are they interchangable in these two examples?
You're not wearing that skirt to school!

You're not going to wear that skirt to school!
It depends on the intonation.
However, assuming they are uttered with the same intonation, they have practically the same meaning.
 

MrPedantic

Key Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I would agree that, with the same intonation, the difference between the two forms would be very slight.

Suppose for instance that the intonation is one of admiring outrage. Perhaps you could say that, in that case, in the version with "going to", the outrage focuses on the intent; whereas in the version without, the outrage focuses on the action as a whole.

Best wishes,

MrP
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
As the mother of a teenage daughter (who thankfully is a conservative dresser), my first thought was simply "No, my dear, you are NOT going to wear that to school, or even out of the house." You left "command" out of the list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top