[Grammar] beyond

[Maybo]

[FONT=Open Sans, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]And beyond the city rises a range of green hills, on whose slopes roses and sunflowers grow for the Sunday market.[/FONT]

[FONT=Open Sans, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]I don't under the structure. Why it is not "[/FONT][FONT=&quot]And beyond the city, it rises a range of green hills, on whose slopes roses and sunflowers grow for the Sunday market." ?

Source: [/FONT]http://mustseeplaces.eu/awesome-things-to-experience-in-bogota/

 

[teechar]

And beyond the city, it rises a range of green hills, on whose slopes roses and sunflowers grow for the Sunday market." ?

That has two subjects, so it's not right.

I don't under the structure.

Look up subject-verb inversion. It's fairly common in English.

Let's move things around a bit.
1- And beyond the city rises a range of green hills, etc.
2- And beyond the city, a range of green hills rises, etc.

Does that help?

 

[Maybo]

It's clear now. Thanks! Another question is that when should I use subject-verb inversion?

If I use normal sentence structure, do I need to change the rest part of sentence structure?
2- And beyond the city, a range of green hills rises, on whose slopes roses and sunflowers grow for the Sunday market.

 

[teechar]

It's clear now. Thanks! Another question is [STRIKE]that[/STRIKE] when should I use subject-verb inversion?

Take a look at the following:
http://www.testmagic.com/Knowledge_Base/lists/grammar/inversion.htm
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/word-order-and-focus/inversion

If I use normal sentence structure, do I need to change the rest [STRIKE]part[/STRIKE] of the sentence structure?

I don't understand what you mean.

And beyond the city, a range of green hills rises, on whose slopes roses and sunflowers grow for the Sunday market.

That's okay.