A
Anonymous
Guest
Hi,
I am now reading "Kant and the Platypus" written by Umberto Eco and needs to translate the book into Chinese. I am not quite sure about the meaning of the following paragraph, especially the underlined part. Could anyone do me a favor. Thanks in advance.
What has Kant got to do with the platypus? Nothing. As we shall see from the dates, he couldn't have had anything to do with it. And this should suffice to justify the title and its use of an incongruous set that sounds like a tribute to Borges's ancient Chinese encyclopedia.
I am now reading "Kant and the Platypus" written by Umberto Eco and needs to translate the book into Chinese. I am not quite sure about the meaning of the following paragraph, especially the underlined part. Could anyone do me a favor. Thanks in advance.
What has Kant got to do with the platypus? Nothing. As we shall see from the dates, he couldn't have had anything to do with it. And this should suffice to justify the title and its use of an incongruous set that sounds like a tribute to Borges's ancient Chinese encyclopedia.