jiang
Key Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2003
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Chinese
- Home Country
- China
- Current Location
- China
Dear teachers,
I have five questions to ask.
No.1
In a year when public concern over violence tops the opinion surveys, the feds are trying all three, but the impact is problematic.
I consulted the word 'fed' in the dictionary 'fed' is the short term for 'federation' . Since the context is U.S.A it should refer to the federal government. My question is why 'feds'?
No.2 Please read the following paragraph ( this is in the same passage as the above one)
Fierce debate over funding lies ahead. The Senate has passed a bill that would cost taxpayers more than $22 billion over five years, and the National Council on Crime and delinquency says it eventually could run $351 billion more, mostly for prison expansion. Even more lockups would be needed for providing life terms for criminals convicted three times of violent acts. The Clinton administration rejected arguments that such measures would lead to prisons for the aged and urged Congress to pass a carefully drawn "three strikes" measure to "send a strong message".
Question No.1: 'life terms' is opposite to 'death term'. But what that have to do with 'three times of violent acts' ? I don't think it makes sense to say 'if a person commits crimes three times he won't be sentenced to death but the police have to put him to lockup' because what about murder? He will certainly be sentenced to death even once.
Question No.2: 'such meansures would lead to prisons for the aged'. Why the aged? I don't think aged people are sure to commit a crime.
Question No.3: What's this 'three strikes' measure? I guess it's more of a cultural question than a comhension one.
Question No.4: 'send a strong message' . Does it mean a regulation that
would frighten criminals?
I am looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you in advance.
Jiang
I have five questions to ask.
No.1
In a year when public concern over violence tops the opinion surveys, the feds are trying all three, but the impact is problematic.
I consulted the word 'fed' in the dictionary 'fed' is the short term for 'federation' . Since the context is U.S.A it should refer to the federal government. My question is why 'feds'?
No.2 Please read the following paragraph ( this is in the same passage as the above one)
Fierce debate over funding lies ahead. The Senate has passed a bill that would cost taxpayers more than $22 billion over five years, and the National Council on Crime and delinquency says it eventually could run $351 billion more, mostly for prison expansion. Even more lockups would be needed for providing life terms for criminals convicted three times of violent acts. The Clinton administration rejected arguments that such measures would lead to prisons for the aged and urged Congress to pass a carefully drawn "three strikes" measure to "send a strong message".
Question No.1: 'life terms' is opposite to 'death term'. But what that have to do with 'three times of violent acts' ? I don't think it makes sense to say 'if a person commits crimes three times he won't be sentenced to death but the police have to put him to lockup' because what about murder? He will certainly be sentenced to death even once.
Question No.2: 'such meansures would lead to prisons for the aged'. Why the aged? I don't think aged people are sure to commit a crime.
Question No.3: What's this 'three strikes' measure? I guess it's more of a cultural question than a comhension one.
Question No.4: 'send a strong message' . Does it mean a regulation that
would frighten criminals?
I am looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you in advance.
Jiang