Confusing

[Taka]

The sentence (from http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...0?v=glance&s=dvd&n=507846&vi=customer-reviews):

The hope comes from the love of the brother and sister for each other and their dignity. Despite their many hardships they are, with a few exceptions where Saita completely breaks down, well mannered. Meanwhile, everyone they meet cares only for themselves, or at least shows a rude ambivilance towards the two. The contrast is incredible. Yet, judgement is not passed upon them. It is left to us to judge. Nor is judgement passed on the enemy, whom the closest we get to, is seeing them as they streak overhead in their bombers.

About "Nor is judgement passed on the enemy, whom the closest we get to, is seeing them as they streak overhead in their bombers.", (a) grammatically, what is "the closest", an adverb or something else? (b) is "is" in "is seeing them as they streak" a typo? (To me, "is" seems unnecessary there).

Taka

 

[MikeNewYork]

The sentence (from http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...0?v=glance&s=dvd&n=507846&vi=customer-reviews):

The hope comes from the love of the brother and sister for each other and their dignity. Despite their many hardships they are, with a few exceptions where Saita completely breaks down, well mannered. Meanwhile, everyone they meet cares only for themselves, or at least shows a rude ambivilance towards the two. The contrast is incredible. Yet, judgement is not passed upon them. It is left to us to judge. Nor is judgement passed on the enemy, whom the closest we get to, is seeing them as they streak overhead in their bombers.

About "Nor is judgement passed on the enemy, whom the closest we get to, is seeing them as they streak overhead in their bombers.", (a) grammatically, what is "the closest", an adverb or something else? (b) is "is" in "is seeing them as they streak" a typo? (To me, "is" seems unnecessary there).

Taka

It is a strange construction, and would be better rephrased. At the very least, I would change it to: Nor is judgement passed on the enemy; the closest we get to the enemy is seeing them as they streak overhead in their bombers.

"The closest" is difficult to classify. It is, of its nature, adjectival or adverbial, but it is preceded by a definite article, which is reserved for substantives. Therefore, I would say that "closest" is being used as a noun or there is an implied noun, such as "point" that is an ellipsis after "closest". Then "the closest (point)" becomes the subject of the clause: The closest is seeing them...bombers. In that clause, "seeing" introduces a gerund phrase, acting as a predicate nominative after the linking verb "is" (which is necessary, by the way). The remainder "whom we get to" is a relative clause, (that) we get to whom. This modifies "closest" and "whom" refers back to "enemy".

A bit complex. Does it answer your question? :wink:

 

[Taka]

A bit complex. Does it answer your question? :wink:

Yes, it really does!!

Without your comments, I wouldn't have realized that there is an implied noun, such as "point" that is an ellipsis after "closest".


Zillion thanks to you Mike!

 

[MikeNewYork]

A bit complex. Does it answer your question? :wink:

Yes, it really does!!

Without your comments, I wouldn't have realized that there is an implied noun, such as "point" that is an ellipsis after "closest".


Zillion thanks to you Mike!

No problem. It was my analysis; there may be others. I am hesitant to use ellipsis to solve grammar problems, but sometimes it is necessary to do that. :wink:

 

[Tdol]

Don't worry, Mike; your secret's safe with us.;-)

 

[MikeNewYork]

Don't worry, Mike; your secret's safe with us.;-)

LOL! We both know a guy who would analyze that text by adding more than was already there. :roll:

 

[Taka]

Ah, gentlemen, I don't know what you're talking about.

 

[MikeNewYork]

Ah, gentlemen, I don't know what you talking about.

We are talking about the overuse of "ellipsis" in explaining grammar. This is adding words that are not present. :wink:

 

[Taka]

Ah, gentlemen, I don't know what you talking about.

We are talking about the overuse of "ellipsis" in explaining grammar. This is adding words that are not present. :wink:

I know what "ellipsis" is.

My question is, how do tdol's jokes (and yours) relate to "ellipsis" ??

 

[Tdol]

On another forum, there's a poster who's really into ellipsis and he and Mike have discussed the issue on a number of occasions, with Mike's position generally being to avoid ellipsis unless absolutley necessary, while the other guy can find ellipsis almost everywhere. ;-)

 

[Taka]

On another forum, there's a poster who's really into ellipsis and he and Mike have discussed the issue on a number of occasions, with Mike's position generally being to avoid ellipsis unless absolutley necessary, while the other guy can find ellipsis almost everywhere. ;-)

Ah, I see.

Thanks for the explanation!

 

[MikeNewYork]

On another forum, there's a poster who's really into ellipsis and he and Mike have discussed the issue on a number of occasions, with Mike's position generally being to avoid ellipsis unless absolutley necessary, while the other guy can find ellipsis almost everywhere. ;-)

'Tis a good description. :wink: