A
Anonymous
Guest
Bush's Agenda pamphlet is entitled....... "A PLan For A Safer World And More Hopeful America" IS it correct to say "more" with hopeful. I was told you can only be hopeful, not more hopeful.
Thank you
GM
Thank you
GM
-
Exciting news! With our new Ad-Free Premium Subscription you can enjoy a distraction-free browsing experience while supporting our site's growth. Without ads, you have less distractions and enjoy faster page load times. Upgrade is optional. Find out more here, and enjoy ad-free learning with us!
- Status
Mister Micawber
Key Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
- Member Type
- English Teacher
- Native Language
- English
- Home Country
- United States
- Current Location
- Japan
I can be more or less hopeful about many things, gmdad. I don't believe that I've seen 'hopeful' in a list of real absolutes like 'unique, absolute, dead, genuine'.
Here is Wikipedia's take on the problem:
'A perennial issue in English usage involves the comparison of so called "absolute" adjectives, the use of terms of comparison with words that in logic are not thought to admit of comparison. There are, of course, many adjectives that admit of no comparison, chiefly because the qualities they name are either present or absent; nothing is *more Cretaceous or *more igneous. The issue arises with words such as 'perfect', which according to the prescriptivists is another quality that does not admit of comparison; either something is perfect or it is not. Since true perfection is unachievable in the sublunary sphere, people like the drafters of the Constitution of the United States are constantly saying things like 'form a more perfect union'; what they mean, of course, is 'more nearly perfect', and this is what the usage prescriptivists think they should have written. Since good writers and important leaders have used the contested form, the prescriptivists are bucking a well established usage here; in practice, the contested form is understood without error.
Here is Wikipedia's take on the problem:
'A perennial issue in English usage involves the comparison of so called "absolute" adjectives, the use of terms of comparison with words that in logic are not thought to admit of comparison. There are, of course, many adjectives that admit of no comparison, chiefly because the qualities they name are either present or absent; nothing is *more Cretaceous or *more igneous. The issue arises with words such as 'perfect', which according to the prescriptivists is another quality that does not admit of comparison; either something is perfect or it is not. Since true perfection is unachievable in the sublunary sphere, people like the drafters of the Constitution of the United States are constantly saying things like 'form a more perfect union'; what they mean, of course, is 'more nearly perfect', and this is what the usage prescriptivists think they should have written. Since good writers and important leaders have used the contested form, the prescriptivists are bucking a well established usage here; in practice, the contested form is understood without error.
- Status