HaraKiriBlade
Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Korean
- Home Country
- South Korea
- Current Location
- South Korea
Hi,
1. Everyone has a right to life.
2. Everyone has the right to life.
In effect, I guess both mean the same. However, I would like to know the subtle difference that might exist between the two. I used to think that only the second example was grammatically correct, because this right to life isn't just any right, but a specified right with a limited scope (right to life). However, I noticed that people generally go with the first example. Can anyone explain the difference? Articles in English are sure a tough nut to crack.
Thank you.
1. Everyone has a right to life.
2. Everyone has the right to life.
In effect, I guess both mean the same. However, I would like to know the subtle difference that might exist between the two. I used to think that only the second example was grammatically correct, because this right to life isn't just any right, but a specified right with a limited scope (right to life). However, I noticed that people generally go with the first example. Can anyone explain the difference? Articles in English are sure a tough nut to crack.
Thank you.