dynamical object

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Anonymous

Guest
Hello,

I have great trouble understanding the following underlined parts. :cry: Could anyone kindly give me a hand? Thank you so much.

As a matter of fact, in the first part of A Theory of Semiotics I
began with a problem: If, in Peircean sense, there is such a thing as Dynamical Object, we know it only through an Immediate Object. By manipulating signs, we refer to the Dynamical Object as a terminus ad quem of semiosis. In the second part of the book, devoted to the ways in which signs are produced, I presupposed that if we speak it is because Something urges us to speak. And this ushered in the problem of the Dynamical Object as a terminus a quo.
The decision to state the problem of the Dynamical Object first in terms of its being a terminus ad quemwas to determine my success interests, following the development of semiosis as a sequence of interpretants - interpretants being a collect, public, observable product laid down in the course of cultural processes, even though one does not presume the existence of a mind that admits of, uses, or develops them. This led to what I have written on the problem of signification, the text and intertextuality, narrativity and the elaboration and limits of interpretation. [/u]
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
By manipulating signs, we refer to the Dynamical Object as a terminus ad quem of semiosis.

The Peircean sign is a triadic relation that connects an object, O, to a representamen, R, and then to an interpretant I. The triadic sign relation provides a tool for showing conceptual relationships. In the case of a radar system, for example, the actual aircraft would be the (Dynamic) object, the representamen (Immediate Object: mental image) is the track symbol or a blip on a display, and the interpretant is the radar operator. The User's quality measures.Source

terminus ad quem is a Latin phrases for "limit from which" and "limit to which;" hence, the temporal starting-point and ending-point for the occurrence of any event, the moments of its beginning and its completion.Source
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
It's not light reading. ;-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top