ed participle

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Anonymous

Guest
Given the following context, which of the sentences 1 or 2 would be appropriate to use:
"We heard that there had been an accident near our place and that someone had been injured."
1-We learnt later that the person injured was Mr. X.
2-We learnt later that the injured person was Mr. X.
 

Red5

Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Re: ed participle again

I think I would opt for number 2... We learnt later that the injured person was Mr. X.
 

Red5

Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
Re: ed participle again

gwendolinest said:
They are both correct.

I agree. I'd say that they're both correct, but I feel #2 is more natural sounding for some reason. :wink:
 
F

FW

Guest
Re: ed participle again

It seems to me that they don't really mean the same thing. I am not a native speaker and might be entirely wrong and that's why I am asking this.

A-"The man wounded" means to me the man who GOT wounded.
B-"The wounded man" means to me the man who had been wounded, who was in a wounded state.
Consider:
C-"There was a shoot-out in the street and a man got shot. The man shot was Mr. X."
I don't think you could say "the shot man", you have to say "the man who had been shot".
Now I don't know whether you could say:
D-"There was a shoot-out in the street and a man got shot. The man shot was take to the hospital."
To me it sounds OK, but I have doubts.
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Re: ed participle again

I have no problem with 'the man shot'- it's fine. :D
 

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
Re: ed participle again

But then, could we use "injured" in the same way as "shot" or couldn't we?
"I took the man injured to the hospital."
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I wouldn't. I'd talk about 'people injured', but by the time you're taking him to hospital, he'd have become an 'injured man' as we're no longer looking at the direct consequences of the accident. ;-)
 

navi tasan

Key Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Armenian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
United States
Logical.
Thanks TDOL.
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I would prefer the injured man to the man shot. You could also say the victim.

8)
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
navi tasan said:
Logical.
Thanks TDOL.
It's like the difference between finding the 'dead man' and finding the 'man dead.' :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top