• Exciting news! With our new Ad-Free Premium Subscription you can enjoy a distraction-free browsing experience while supporting our site's growth. Without ads, you have less distractions and enjoy faster page load times. Upgrade is optional. Find out more here, and enjoy ad-free learning with us!

Emerson Coelho

Status
Not open for further replies.
U

Unregistered

Guest
hello all, I have got my self in a such a doubt!
A stuck up teacher said to me that the sentence:

I eat rice with beans;

is not correct, well as far as i was concerned it is correct, as the webster says that u use WITH, talking about food to indicate accompaniment; here is what webster says:

[used as a function word to indicate combination, accompaniment, presence, or addition <heat milk with honey>];

is it correct or not? if not why?

kind regards
Emerson Coelho
 

vil

Key Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Bulgarian
Home Country
Bulgaria
Current Location
Bulgaria
Dear Emerson Coelho,

In my opinion you should say "rice and beans". For your information I am neither teacher nor NES.

The dish in New Orleans is called "Beans 'n' rice". if talking about rice and beans, but to be more specific, "red beans 'n' rice" would be used to describe the popular local dish.

The dish usually consists of white rice accompanied by brown, red or black dry beans and seasoned in various ways.

In many areas rice and beans are often be served side by side rather than mixed together. Either way they may be considered a meal o as a side dish to accompany a main dish of meat or chicken.

Regards.

V.
 
Last edited:

vil

Key Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Bulgarian
Home Country
Bulgaria
Current Location
Bulgaria
Dear Emerson Coelho,

Sorry, this was an unwanted repetition.

V.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top