'Have been' vs 'are being'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Offroad

Key Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Brazilian Portuguese
Home Country
Brazil
Current Location
Brazil
Dear teachers

Am I right with the following interpretation:

This is the original sentence:
Several technologies are being developed and represent viable alternatives to the use of this material.

This is the modification I suggested:
Several technologies have been under development and represent alternatives to the use of this material.

Honestly, I can't tell if the first sentence is wrong, neither can I assure the later is right.

Please, share your thoughts on this.

Very much appreciated

Offroad
 

Gillnetter

Key Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Dear teachers

Am I right with the following interpretation:

This is the original sentence:
Several technologies are being developed and represent viable alternatives to the use of this material.

These technologies are currently being developed.

This is the modification I suggested:
Several technologies have been under development and represent alternatives to the use of this material.
One is not sure of when this development took place. For example, work on an efficient steam engine has been under development, off and on, for the past two hundred years.

Honestly, I can't tell if the first sentence is wrong, neither can I assure you that the [STRIKE]later [/STRIKE] latter is right.

Please, share your thoughts on this.

Very much appreciated

Offroad
Gil
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
In both cases we are left uncertain whether the development has been completed, and therefore the author's statement that the new technologies represent viable alternatives is unsupported.

If he had said "several technologies have been developed" it might be true that some of them have turned out to be viable alternatives.
 

Offroad

Key Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Brazilian Portuguese
Home Country
Brazil
Current Location
Brazil
As a matter of fact, those technologies have been used for years but are still being improved, just like cars, mobile phones etc. so... I guess my statement works.
 
Last edited:

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
Sorry, but I disagree. If you wish to claim that they are currently viable alternatives, you should say "have been developed" rather than "have been in development." The fact that successful technologies are still undergoing further development is usually taken for granted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top