• Exciting news! With our new Ad-Free Premium Subscription you can enjoy a distraction-free browsing experience while supporting our site's growth. Without ads, you have less distractions and enjoy faster page load times. Upgrade is optional. Find out more here, and enjoy ad-free learning with us!

He had the peach to himself.

Status
Not open for further replies.

keannu

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
What's the difference between 1 and 2? What is the function of "to himself" here? It sounds really awkward to me.

1. He had the peach.
2. He had the peach to himself.
 

probus

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Canada
Current Location
Canada
It is an idiom. To have something to oneself means to enjoy exclusive possession and use of it, with absolutely no need to share it with anyone else. A Canadian example: If we can just get rid of those pesky Russians and Scandinavians, we'll have the whole Arctic to ourselves.
 

BobK

Harmless drudge
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
:up: So 'He had the peach to himself' is quite unlikely, unless peach-sharing is the norm. But many holiday-makers say things like "It was lovely, and totally off the beaten track. We had the beach to ourselves.'

b
 

BobK

Harmless drudge
Staff member
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
UK
Afterthought: don't be confused (if you are) by similar expressions in other languages - e.g. comerse. If this isn't relevant to your question, forget it. ;-)

b
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top