idiom

Status
Not open for further replies.

vanveen

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
(Afan) Oromo
Home Country
Aaland
Current Location
Aaland
Hello,
what does the following phrase literally mean?
"It is morally less confusing to be goosed by a travelling salesman than by a bishop".

Does "goose" in this context simply mean "hoodwink", despite its literal meaning "to hit someone's buttocks"?
 

Barb_D

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I assume it means having that person pinch your bottom/bum.

Someone who gooses you doesn't hit you; it's more of a fondle.
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Hello,
what does the following phrase literally mean?
"It is morally less confusing to be goosed by a travelling salesman than by a bishop".

Does "goose" in this context simply mean "hoodwink", despite its literal meaning "to hit someone's buttocks"?

***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Hello, Vanveen.

(1) If I am not wrong (and I could easily be), "to goose"

someone is much more than touching or fondling. Since this

is a family-oriented website, I cannot be more specific. I suggest

that you check the Web for a more complete definition.

***** Thank you *****
 

vanveen

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
(Afan) Oromo
Home Country
Aaland
Current Location
Aaland
***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Hello, Vanveen.

(1) If I am not wrong (and I could easily be), "to goose"

someone is much more than touching or fondling. Since this

is a family-oriented website, I cannot be more specific. I suggest

that you check the Web for a more complete definition.

***** Thank you *****


No but the context is as follows:
The integrity of a writer is more threatened by appeals to his social conscience, his political or religious convictions, than by appeals to his cupidity. It is morally less confusing to be goosed by a travelling salesman than by a bishop.

Do you think the author goes that far here?
 

TheParser

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
No but the context is as follows:
The integrity of a writer is more threatened by appeals to his social conscience, his political or religious convictions, than by appeals to his cupidity. It is morally less confusing to be goosed by a travelling salesman than by a bishop.

Do you think the author goes that far here?

***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Hello, Vanveen.

(1) Thank you for your note.

(2) I'm sorry, but I really do not know.

(3) Hopefully, a smarter person than I can answer your question.

I, too, would like to know the answer.

***** Thank you *****:)
 

Heterological

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Member Type
English Teacher
Gillnetter gives a good explanation of the meaning of the phrase you originally posted. I'll try to make sense of the context.

The integrity of a writer is more threatened by appeals to his social conscience, his political or religious convictions, than by appeals to his cupidity. It is morally less confusing to be goosed by a travelling salesman than by a bishop.

It sounds as though the writer of this piece is arguing that writing ought to be an art for art's sake, not a means to an end. Writers should write to express deep and eternal truths, not to advance a social agenda or make themselves rich. Now, we all recognize that writers still need to eat, and so we expect that they will sometimes bow to commercial interests in order to make money (that's their cupidity, or greed, at work.) This is similar to a traveling salesman, a character not renowned for propriety, being overly familiar and flirtatious; it's not really right, but it's sort of expected. However, some writers don't just write for artistic reasons or mercenary reasons; they write to promote a social, political, or religious agenda. In the view of the person who wrote this passage, this is not merely wrong, it's upsetting on a deeper level than a writer doing commercial hack work to pay the bills.

Where did you read this?
 

Raymott

VIP Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
***** NOT A TEACHER *****

Hello, Vanveen.

(1) If I am not wrong (and I could easily be), "to goose"

someone is much more than touching or fondling. Since this

is a family-oriented website, I cannot be more specific. I suggest

that you check the Web for a more complete definition.

***** Thank you *****
Urban Dictionary: goose
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top