Idioms: A friend in need is a friend indeed & ...

Status
Not open for further replies.

bmo

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Two idiom examples (1 & 3) in my article to a Taiwanese newspaper were changed to (2 & 4). Are the changes correct?

1. Tony Blair is a true friend of the United States whose help we can all count on in a time of need. A friend in need is a friend indeed.

2. Tony Blair is a true friend of the United States that his help we can all count on in a time of need. A friend in need is a friend indeed.

3. Failing to pass a California state budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, added fuel to the fire for the recall process that Governor Gray Davis is facing.

4. Fail to pass a California state budget for the fiscal year 2004 beginning from July 1, added fuel to the fire for the recall process that Governor Gray Davis is facing.

Thank you very much.

BMO
 

Red5

Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
BMO, I think your answers (1 & 3) are actually correct; they certainly sound more natural than the "corrected" versions (2 & 4). :-|
 

bmo

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Thanks Red5, are you saying:

1. "Whose help" is better than "that his help," but grammatically the later is also correct.

2. "Fail to pass" is wrong. It is supposed to be a gerund (?), "failing to pass" is the subject of verb added. Am I right?

3. "Fiscal year 2004 beginning from July 1" is grammatically correct, but the word "from" is actually not needed, in fact, it makes it unnatural.

Thanks again.

BMO
 

Red5

Webmaster, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I am suggesting that your versions are correct, and the bold edited versions are incorrect; they don't make sense to me.

I'm afraid we'll have to wait for a real English teacher to log on before you get a clear grammatical answer to this (I am not a teacher), but I'd be suprised if they disagree.
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
Your versions are correct, though I'd put a comma before 'whose' as it is non-restrivtive (non-defining) as there is only one Tony Blair. You're right about the gerund, because it needs to be that to be the subject. 'That' doesn't make sense unless you rewrite the sentence. ;-)
 

bmo

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Thanks to Red5 and Tdol. It sure looks better with a comma after Tony Blair.

BMO
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
I dread to think what would happen if there were more than one. ;-)
 

bmo

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
tdol said:
I dread to think what would happen if there were more than one. ;-)

My mistake; the comma is before whose. Thanks again. BMO
 

Tdol

Editor, UsingEnglish.com
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Native Language
British English
Home Country
UK
Current Location
Japan
You're welcome. ;-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top