"inartistic" and "unartistic"

GeneD

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Belarus
Current Location
Belarus
I'm reading an article at the moment about negative prefixes (in- and un-, to be precise) in English. Here's the quote from the article that intrigued me: "A few pairs are still fighting it out, such as inarguable and unarguable. Others have distinct senses, such as unhuman and inhuman, or inartistic and unartistic". The link to the article: http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-unv1.htm

I've looked the words in bold up in the dictionary (1. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/inartistic; 2. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/unartistic), and I can't say I see the difference between their meanings. Could you please explain it to me if you see it?
 
Last edited:

Rover_KE

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Member Type
Retired English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
England
Current Location
England
I'd use unartistic to describe a person with little or no expertise in drawing, painting or sketching, and inartistic to describe some thing or other which was not aesthetically pleasing, such as a not very beautiful flower arrangement, musical performance, dance routine, display of paintings/photographs etc.

But there's considerable crossover in their usage.
 
Top