• Exciting news! With our new Ad-Free Premium Subscription you can enjoy a distraction-free browsing experience while supporting our site's growth. Without ads, you have less distractions and enjoy faster page load times. Upgrade is optional. Find out more here, and enjoy ad-free learning with us!

Intercepting Phrases

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ayed

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Hi, my experts and teachers

I hope you are in good mood.

My preferred Newspaper is USA Today Newspaper so far. I usually come across some kind of truncated phrases--intercepting ones . Tell you what, read it yourself:
“ Jurors rejected her plea, convicting her of murder, and she is serving life in prison. Yates becomes eligible for parole in 2041”
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-10-14-yates_x.htm

My question is :
what sort of verb , phrase , “convicting her of murder”
can it be read as “Jurors are convicting her of murder”?
Waiting your comments.
Have my rememberances
Ayed ,
:)
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I think you mean interesting phrases. :wink:

In the newpaper article it mentions that Yates claimed insanity. That is the plea the jurors rejected. They convicted her of murder.


Ayed said:
My question is :
what sort of verb , phrase , “convicting her of murder”
can it be read as “Jurors are convicting her of murder”?

It is, I think, a participial phrase. Read it as that they convicted her of murder.

Do you have any more?

:D
 

Ayed

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
RonBee.
Thank you for your continuous healing stings, :wink:

read from you soon.
My greetings , in advance, be received .
thanks
Ayed,
:D
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
I am curious. What do you mean by stings?

:)
 

Casiopea

VIP Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Member Type
Other
I agree with Ronbee. :)

'convicting her' functions as a participle, an -ing adjective to be exact. Since it modifies the noun 'Jurors', we kind of expect it to be closer to the word 'Jurors', as in 2. below, and not separated from it by the verb phrase 'rejected her plea', as in 1.

1. Jurors rejected her plea, convicting her,....
2. Jurors, convicting her, rejected her plea,...

But, 2. is unacceptable in terms of semantics (meaning), and here's the "why", if we place 'convict' before 'reject', we alter the sequence of events: first the jurors convicted her and then they rejected her plea. :shock: So, the author, in order to avoid that meaning, changed the verb 'convicted her' to an adjective 'convicting her' and placed it after the verb phrase 'rejected her plea' so as to express the events in the order they happened.

Cas :D

Waiting your comments => Waiting for your comments
Have my rememberances => My Regards
 

Ayed

Junior Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Mr. RonBee,
sting denotes your nickname RonBEE, :)
got it now?


-----------------
Casiopea, thank you so much because you shed much light on my question.
whisper :" Mr.RonBee may get upset if I praise you much than him"
anyway,
have my heartfelt regards
thank you
Ayed
:)[/i]
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
Yes, I get it now. Thanks. :D

Casiopea is very helpful. She comes up with all that grammar stuff right off the top of her head. I am glad you found her contribution useful.

:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top