Is or Are

Status
Not open for further replies.

jack

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2004
All of the lake is out of bounds. <--why is "is" not "are"? and why is "bounds" not "bound"?
All of you are qually guilty. <---why is "are" not is?
 

RonBee

Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2003
Member Type
Other
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
In an "all of" phrase "all" takes the number of the word following "all of". In the first sentence, "the lake" is singular. In the second sentence, "you" is intended to be plural. (It should say "equally guilty".)

:)
 

MikeNewYork

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
American English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
jack said:
All of the lake is out of bounds. <--why is "is" not "are"? and why is "bounds" not "bound"?
All of you are qually guilty. <---why is "are" not is?

The problem is that "all" has different meanings. When it means the entirety of a single thing, it is singular. When it means all members of a group, it is plural.

All of the cake was eaten.
All of the cakes were eaten.

Ron's hint about the number of the word after "of" controlling the verb is a good one. :wink:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top